These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32100055)

  • 1. Value and limitation of structure-based profilers to characterize developmental and reproductive toxicity potential.
    Manganelli S; Schilter B; Scholz G; Benfenati E; Lo Piparo E
    Arch Toxicol; 2020 Mar; 94(3):939-954. PubMed ID: 32100055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A strategy for safety assessment of chemicals with data gaps for developmental and/or reproductive toxicity.
    Blackburn K; Daston G; Fisher J; Lester C; Naciff JM; Rufer ES; Stuard SB; Woeller K
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jul; 72(2):202-15. PubMed ID: 25910676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. COSMOS next generation - A public knowledge base leveraging chemical and biological data to support the regulatory assessment of chemicals.
    Yang C; Cronin MTD; Arvidson KB; Bienfait B; Enoch SJ; Heldreth B; Hobocienski B; Muldoon-Jacobs K; Lan Y; Madden JC; Magdziarz T; Marusczyk J; Mostrag A; Nelms M; Neagu D; Przybylak K; Rathman JF; Park J; Richarz AN; Richard AM; Ribeiro JV; Sacher O; Schwab C; Vitcheva V; Volarath P; Worth AP
    Comput Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 19():100175. PubMed ID: 34405124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of in silico modelling to estimate toxicity of migrating substances from food packaging.
    Price N; Chaudhry Q
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 71():136-41. PubMed ID: 24923263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Framework for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as developmental or reproductive toxicants.
    Wu S; Fisher J; Naciff J; Laufersweiler M; Lester C; Daston G; Blackburn K
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2013 Dec; 26(12):1840-61. PubMed ID: 24206190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constructing a developmental and reproductive toxicity database of chemicals (DART NIHS DB) for integrated approaches to testing and assessment.
    Yamada T; Miura M; Kawamura T; Ushida K; Inoue K; Kuwagata M; Katsutani N; Hirose A
    J Toxicol Sci; 2021; 46(11):531-538. PubMed ID: 34719556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Leveraging complementary computational models for prioritizing chemicals of developmental and reproductive toxicity concern: an example of food contact materials.
    Tung CW; Cheng HJ; Wang CC; Wang SS; Lin P
    Arch Toxicol; 2020 Feb; 94(2):485-494. PubMed ID: 31897520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrated strategy for mutagenicity prediction applied to food contact chemicals.
    Manganelli S; Schilter B; Benfenati E; Manganaro A; Lo Piparo E
    ALTEX; 2018; 35(2):169-178. PubMed ID: 28922667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural features of endocrine active chemicals--A comparison of in vivo and in vitro data.
    Lewin G; Escher SE; van der Burg B; Simetska N; Mangelsdorf I
    Reprod Toxicol; 2015 Aug; 55():81-94. PubMed ID: 25461902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hazard prioritisation of substances in printing inks and adhesives applied to plastic food packaging.
    Galbiati E; Jacxsens L; De Meulenaer B
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2021 Sep; 38(9):1608-1626. PubMed ID: 34372753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishing the level of safety concern for chemicals in food without the need for toxicity testing.
    Schilter B; Benigni R; Boobis A; Chiodini A; Cockburn A; Cronin MT; Lo Piparo E; Modi S; Thiel A; Worth A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Mar; 68(2):275-96. PubMed ID: 24012706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of QSAR models using artificial neural network analysis for risk assessment of repeated-dose, reproductive, and developmental toxicities of cosmetic ingredients.
    Hisaki T; Aiba Née Kaneko M; Yamaguchi M; Sasa H; Kouzuki H
    J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Apr; 40(2):163-80. PubMed ID: 25786522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing.
    Kroes R; Galli C; Munro I; Schilter B; Tran L; Walker R; Würtzen G
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2000; 38(2-3):255-312. PubMed ID: 10717364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exposure to endocrine disrupting compounds via the food chain: Is packaging a relevant source?
    Muncke J
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Aug; 407(16):4549-59. PubMed ID: 19482336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
    Dent MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet.
    Kroes R; Renwick AG; Cheeseman M; Kleiner J; Mangelsdorf I; Piersma A; Schilter B; Schlatter J; van Schothorst F; Vos JG; Würtzen G;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jan; 42(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 14630131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the safety of co-exposure to food packaging migrants in food and water using the maximum cumulative ratio and an established decision tree.
    Price P; Zaleski R; Hollnagel H; Ketelslegers H; Han X
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2014; 31(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 24320041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impacts of food contact chemicals on human health: a consensus statement.
    Muncke J; Andersson AM; Backhaus T; Boucher JM; Carney Almroth B; Castillo Castillo A; Chevrier J; Demeneix BA; Emmanuel JA; Fini JB; Gee D; Geueke B; Groh K; Heindel JJ; Houlihan J; Kassotis CD; Kwiatkowski CF; Lefferts LY; Maffini MV; Martin OV; Myers JP; Nadal A; Nerin C; Pelch KE; Fernández SR; Sargis RM; Soto AM; Trasande L; Vandenberg LN; Wagner M; Wu C; Zoeller RT; Scheringer M
    Environ Health; 2020 Mar; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 32122363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.