These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32101373)

  • 1. Calibrations and validations of biological models with an application on the renal fibrosis.
    Karagiannis G; Hao W; Lin G
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 May; 36(5):e3329. PubMed ID: 32101373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emulator-based Bayesian optimization for efficient multi-objective calibration of an individual-based model of malaria.
    Reiker T; Golumbeanu M; Shattock A; Burgert L; Smith TA; Filippi S; Cameron E; Penny MA
    Nat Commun; 2021 Dec; 12(1):7212. PubMed ID: 34893600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Maximum-Likelihood Approach to Force-Field Calibration.
    Zaborowski B; Jagieła D; Czaplewski C; Hałabis A; Lewandowska A; Żmudzińska W; Ołdziej S; Karczyńska A; Omieczynski C; Wirecki T; Liwo A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):2050-70. PubMed ID: 26263302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian Methods for Calibrating Health Policy Models: A Tutorial.
    Menzies NA; Soeteman DI; Pandya A; Kim JJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Jun; 35(6):613-624. PubMed ID: 28247184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GpABC: a Julia package for approximate Bayesian computation with Gaussian process emulation.
    Tankhilevich E; Ish-Horowicz J; Hameed T; Roesch E; Kleijn I; Stumpf MPH; He F
    Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(10):3286-3287. PubMed ID: 32022854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calibration of Cohorts of Virtual Patient Heart Models Using Bayesian History Matching.
    Rodero C; Longobardi S; Augustin C; Strocchi M; Plank G; Lamata P; Niederer SA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 51(1):241-252. PubMed ID: 36271218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. r2ogs5: Calibration of Numerical Groundwater Flow Models with Bayesian Optimization in R.
    Schad P; Boog J; Kalbacher T
    Ground Water; 2023 Jan; 61(1):119-130. PubMed ID: 35729090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical emulation of landslide-induced tsunamis at the Rockall Bank, NE Atlantic.
    Salmanidou DM; Guillas S; Georgiopoulou A; Dias F
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2017 Apr; 473(2200):20170026. PubMed ID: 28484339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of likelihood and Bayesian methods for estimating divergence times using multiple gene Loci and calibration points, with application to a radiation of cute-looking mouse lemur species.
    Yang Z; Yoder AD
    Syst Biol; 2003 Oct; 52(5):705-16. PubMed ID: 14530137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating fossil calibrations for dating phylogenies in light of rates of molecular evolution: a comparison of three approaches.
    Lukoschek V; Scott Keogh J; Avise JC
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):22-43. PubMed ID: 21840843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Active learning for efficiently training emulators of computationally expensive mathematical models.
    Ellis AG; Iskandar R; Schmid CH; Wong JB; Trikalinos TA
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(25):3521-3548. PubMed ID: 32779814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequentially calibrating a Bayesian microsimulation model to incorporate new information and assumptions.
    DeYoreo M; Rutter CM; Ozik J; Collier N
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 35022005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data.
    Van Oijen M; Rougier J; Smith R
    Tree Physiol; 2005 Jul; 25(7):915-27. PubMed ID: 15870058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian history matching of complex infectious disease models using emulation: a tutorial and a case study on HIV in Uganda.
    Andrianakis I; Vernon IR; McCreesh N; McKinley TJ; Oakley JE; Nsubuga RN; Goldstein M; White RG
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Jan; 11(1):e1003968. PubMed ID: 25569850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian Calibration, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification for Predictive Modelling of Tumour Growth: A Tutorial.
    Collis J; Connor AJ; Paczkowski M; Kannan P; Pitt-Francis J; Byrne HM; Hubbard ME
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Apr; 79(4):939-974. PubMed ID: 28290010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis of a Cardiac Cell Model Using a Gaussian Process Emulator.
    Chang ET; Strong M; Clayton RH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130252. PubMed ID: 26114610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for the Calibration of Complex Simulator Using a Gaussian Process Emulator.
    Seo YA; Park JS
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 33396233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different strategies for using fossil calibrations to generate the time prior in Bayesian molecular clock dating.
    Barba-Montoya J; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Sep; 114():386-400. PubMed ID: 28709986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian regression models outperform partial least squares methods for predicting milk components and technological properties using infrared spectral data.
    Ferragina A; de los Campos G; Vazquez AI; Cecchinato A; Bittante G
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):8133-51. PubMed ID: 26387015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compositionally-warped Gaussian processes.
    Rios G; Tobar F
    Neural Netw; 2019 Oct; 118():235-246. PubMed ID: 31319321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.