287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32101431)
1. Microfiber Release to Water, Via Laundering, and to Air, via Everyday Use: A Comparison between Polyester Clothing with Differing Textile Parameters.
De Falco F; Cocca M; Avella M; Thompson RC
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Mar; 54(6):3288-3296. PubMed ID: 32101431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microfiber release from real soiled consumer laundry and the impact of fabric care products and washing conditions.
Lant NJ; Hayward AS; Peththawadu MMD; Sheridan KJ; Dean JR
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233332. PubMed ID: 32502152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Domestic laundry and microfiber pollution: Exploring fiber shedding from consumer apparel textiles.
Vassilenko E; Watkins M; Chastain S; Mertens J; Posacka AM; Patankar S; Ross PS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0250346. PubMed ID: 34242234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of dyes and finishes on the microfibers released on the laundering of cotton knitted fabrics.
Zambrano MC; Pawlak JJ; Daystar J; Ankeny M; Venditti RA
Environ Pollut; 2021 Mar; 272():115998. PubMed ID: 33199065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polyester Textiles as a Source of Microplastics from Households: A Mechanistic Study to Understand Microfiber Release During Washing.
Hernandez E; Nowack B; Mitrano DM
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jun; 51(12):7036-7046. PubMed ID: 28537711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laundering and textile parameters influence fibers release in household washings.
Cesa FS; Turra A; Checon HH; Leonardi B; Baruque-Ramos J
Environ Pollut; 2020 Feb; 257():113553. PubMed ID: 31761586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unveiling the Microfiber Release Footprint: Guiding Control Strategies in the Textile Production Industry.
Wang M; Yang J; Zheng S; Jia L; Yong ZY; Yong EL; See HH; Li J; Lv Y; Fei X; Fang M
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Dec; 57(50):21038-21049. PubMed ID: 38064758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microfiber release from different fabrics during washing.
Yang L; Qiao F; Lei K; Li H; Kang Y; Cui S; An L
Environ Pollut; 2019 Jun; 249():136-143. PubMed ID: 30884392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microfibers generated from the laundering of cotton, rayon and polyester based fabrics and their aquatic biodegradation.
Zambrano MC; Pawlak JJ; Daystar J; Ankeny M; Cheng JJ; Venditti RA
Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 May; 142():394-407. PubMed ID: 31232317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aerobic biodegradation in freshwater and marine environments of textile microfibers generated in clothes laundering: Effects of cellulose and polyester-based microfibers on the microbiome.
Zambrano MC; Pawlak JJ; Daystar J; Ankeny M; Goller CC; Venditti RA
Mar Pollut Bull; 2020 Feb; 151():110826. PubMed ID: 32056618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of quantification method on microfiber assessment - A comparative analysis between mass and count based methods.
Rathinamoorthy R; Raja Balasaraswathi S
J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 347():119040. PubMed ID: 37751666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of fabric conditioning products and lint filter pore size on airborne microfiber pollution arising from tumble drying.
Lant NJ; Defaye MMA; Smith AJ; Kechi-Okafor C; Dean JR; Sheridan KJ
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0265912. PubMed ID: 35385503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microfiber Pollution: A Systematic Literature Review to Overcome the Complexities in Knit Design to Create Solutions for Knit Fabrics.
Allen E; Henninger CE; Garforth A; Asuquo E
Environ Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 58(9):4031-4045. PubMed ID: 38381002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microfiber Masses Recovered from Conventional Machine Washing of New or Aged Garments.
Hartline NL; Bruce NJ; Karba SN; Ruff EO; Sonar SU; Holden PA
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 50(21):11532-11538. PubMed ID: 27689236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enzyme hydrolysis of polyester knitted fabric: A method to control the microfiber shedding from synthetic textile.
Ramasamy R; Subramanian RB
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(54):81265-81278. PubMed ID: 35729395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Capturing microfibers - marketed technologies reduce microfiber emissions from washing machines.
McIlwraith HK; Lin J; Erdle LM; Mallos N; Diamond ML; Rochman CM
Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Feb; 139():40-45. PubMed ID: 30686443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of microplastic release caused by textile washing processes of synthetic fabrics.
De Falco F; Gullo MP; Gentile G; Di Pace E; Cocca M; Gelabert L; Brouta-Agnésa M; Rovira A; Escudero R; Villalba R; Mossotti R; Montarsolo A; Gavignano S; Tonin C; Avella M
Environ Pollut; 2018 May; 236():916-925. PubMed ID: 29107418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of dyes and finishes on the aquatic biodegradability of cotton textile fibers and microfibers released on laundering clothes: Correlations between enzyme adsorption and activity and biodegradation rates.
Zambrano MC; Pawlak JJ; Daystar J; Ankeny M; Venditti RA
Mar Pollut Bull; 2021 Apr; 165():112030. PubMed ID: 33561711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the age of garments used under real-life conditions on microfibre release from polyester and cotton clothing.
Fernandes AN; Lara LZ; De Falco F; Turner A; Thompson RC
Environ Pollut; 2024 May; 348():123806. PubMed ID: 38493865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of microplastics release from polyester fabrics: The impact of different washing conditions.
Dalla Fontana G; Mossotti R; Montarsolo A
Environ Pollut; 2020 Sep; 264():113960. PubMed ID: 32375087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
