These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32101535)

  • 1. Correlation Between Sex and Facial Soft Tissue Characteristics Among Young Saudi Patients with Various Orthodontic Skeletal Malocclusions.
    Ajwa N; Alkhars FA; AlMubarak FH; Aldajani H; AlAli NM; Alhanabbi AH; Alsulaiman SA; Divakar DD
    Med Sci Monit; 2020 Feb; 26():e919771. PubMed ID: 32101535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Male and Female Characteristics of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Evaluated by Cephalometric Radiography.
    Perović T; Blažej Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 May; 24():3415-3424. PubMed ID: 29791323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile in different skeletal malocclusions in relation to age.
    Kiełczykowski M; Perkowski K; Kamiński K; Zadurska M; Czochrowska E
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):711. PubMed ID: 38902685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of soft tissue thickness in persons with malocclusions of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2].
    Tanić T; Blažej Z; Mitić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2012; 140(7-8):412-8. PubMed ID: 23092023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Soft tissue thickness of face profile conditioning by dento-skeletal anomalies].
    Tanić T; Blažej Z; Mitić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2011; 139(7-8):439-45. PubMed ID: 21980651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis.
    Joshi M; Wu LP; Maharjan S; Regmi MR
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26061982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft tissue facial profile of adult Saudis. Lateral cephalometric analysis.
    AlBarakati SF
    Saudi Med J; 2011 Aug; 32(8):836-42. PubMed ID: 21858394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender differences in lower facial soft tissue thickness among different skeletal patterns, based on soft tissue cephalometric analysis.
    Alhumadi A; Al-Khafaji TJ; Hussein Alyassiri AM; Alhamadi WW
    J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():54. PubMed ID: 36411805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
    Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic assessment of facial soft tissue thickness in South Indian population--An anthropologic study.
    Kotrashetti VS; Mallapur MD
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Apr; 39():161-8. PubMed ID: 26924726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
    Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphological features of bimaxillary protrusion in Saudis.
    Aldrees AM; Shamlan MA
    Saudi Med J; 2010 May; 31(5):512-9. PubMed ID: 20464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between malocclusion, soft tissue profile, and pharyngeal airways: A cephalometric study.
    Lopatienė K; Šidlauskas A; Vasiliauskas A; Čečytė L; Švalkauskienė V; Šidlauskas M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2016; 52(5):307-314. PubMed ID: 27816426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Facial Soft Tissue Dimensions in Adult Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Classes using Cone beam Computed Tomography.
    Jazmati HM; Ajaj MA; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 27595719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hard and soft tissue shape variation and changes in Class II division 1 malocclusion during orthodontic treatment: a geometric morphometric analysis.
    Chu CS; Marizan Nor M; Mohamed AM; Mohd Hadi Pritam H
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):931. PubMed ID: 38012634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Midsagittal facial soft tissue thickness norms in an adult Mediterranean population.
    Ayoub F; Saadeh M; Rouhana G; Haddad R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():217.e1-217.e7. PubMed ID: 30455033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated using Twin Block appliances: finite-element scaling analysis.
    Singh GD; Clark WJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 25(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 12831211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Stamenković Z; Raičković V; Ristić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 25845246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial soft tissue thickness differences among different vertical facial patterns.
    Saadeh M; Fayyad-Kazan H; Haddad R; Ayoub F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110468. PubMed ID: 32971443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.