BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32102295)

  • 1. An Extension of the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis with Hesitant Fuzzy Sets to Assess the Occupational Hazards in the Construction Industry.
    Heidary Dahooie J; Vanaki AS; Firoozfar HR; Zavadskas EK; Čereška A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32102295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicriteria decision-making approach with hesitant interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets.
    Peng JJ; Wang JQ; Wang J; Chen XH
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():868515. PubMed ID: 24983009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk assessment of organ transplant operation: A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy FMEA.
    Sabripoor A; Ghousi R; Najafi M; Barzinpour F; Makuei A
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0299655. PubMed ID: 38781279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic multicriteria decision-making method based on generalized prioritized aggregation operator.
    Wu JT; Wang JQ; Wang J; Zhang HY; Chen XH
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():645341. PubMed ID: 25258729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A hybrid decision-making approach based on FCM and MOORA for occupational health and safety risk analysis.
    Dabbagh R; Yousefi S
    J Safety Res; 2019 Dec; 71():111-123. PubMed ID: 31862022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
    Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A data-driven group emergency decision-making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and its application in COVID-19 pandemic.
    Du K; Fan R; Wang Y; Wang D; Qian R; Zhu B
    Appl Soft Comput; 2023 May; 139():110213. PubMed ID: 37009545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making Group Decisions within the Framework of a Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linear Regression Model.
    Sultan A; Sałabun W; Faizi S; Ismail M; Shekhovtsov A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35957293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A fuzzy evaluation and selection of construction and demolition waste utilization modes in Xi'an, China.
    Zhang F; Ju Y; Dong P; Santibanez Gonzalez ED
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jul; 38(7):792-801. PubMed ID: 32160832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Additive manufacturing process selection for automotive industry using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC EDAS.
    Menekse A; Ertemel AV; Camgoz Akdag H; Gorener A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282676. PubMed ID: 36893100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying, evaluating and prioritizing the causes of occupational accidents in the construction industry using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS.
    Abbasinia M; Mohammadfam I
    Work; 2022; 72(3):933-940. PubMed ID: 35634821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Dice measure of cubic hesitant fuzzy sets and its initial evaluation method of benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms.
    Fu J; Ye J; Cui W
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):60. PubMed ID: 30635593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hesitant fuzzy soft sets with application in multicriteria group decision making problems.
    Wang JQ; Li XE; Chen XH
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():806983. PubMed ID: 25688378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans.
    Liao H; Si G; Xu Z; Fujita H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29614019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nature Disaster Risk Evaluation with a Group Decision Making Method Based on Incomplete Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations.
    Tang M; Liao H; Li Z; Xu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29652868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure mode and Effect Analysis of personal fall arrest system under the intuitionistic fuzzy environment.
    Ghasemi F; Rahimi J
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e16606. PubMed ID: 37313142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of occupational health and safety risks in a Turkish public hospital using a two-stage hesitant fuzzy linguistic approach.
    Çalış Boyacı A; Selim A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(24):36313-36325. PubMed ID: 35060048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occupational risk assessment in the construction industry in Iran.
    Seifi Azad Mard HR; Estiri A; Hadadi P; Seifi Azad Mard M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2017 Dec; 23(4):570-577. PubMed ID: 27924685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of neutrosophic cubic hesitant fuzzy exponential aggregation operators with application in environmental protection problems.
    Rehman AU; Gulistan M; Ali M; Al-Shamiri MM; Abdulla S
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):5262. PubMed ID: 37002236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Group Decision-Making Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Entropy and the Complex Proportional Assessment.
    Thakur P; Kizielewicz B; Gandotra N; Shekhovtsov A; Saini N; Sałabun W
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.