BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32102744)

  • 21. Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels.
    Friesen LM; Tremblay KL; Rohila N; Wright RA; Shannon RV; Başkent D; Rubinstein JT
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 120(4):776-82. PubMed ID: 19250865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modulation of P2 auditory-evoked responses by the spectral complexity of musical sounds.
    Shahin A; Roberts LE; Pantev C; Trainor LJ; Ross B
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1781-5. PubMed ID: 16237326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sound-Making Actions Lead to Immediate Plastic Changes of Neuromagnetic Evoked Responses and Induced β-Band Oscillations during Perception.
    Ross B; Barat M; Fujioka T
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(24):5948-5959. PubMed ID: 28539421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of cortical auditory evoked potentials to evaluate neural encoding of speech sounds in adults.
    Agung K; Purdy SC; McMahon CM; Newall P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Sep; 17(8):559-72. PubMed ID: 16999251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal integration of segmented-speech sounds probed with mismatch negativity.
    Asano S; Shiga T; Itagaki S; Yabe H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Dec; 26(17):1061-4. PubMed ID: 26445286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hearing in time: evoked potential studies of temporal processing.
    Picton T
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):385-401. PubMed ID: 24005840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Asymmetries in the processing of vowel height.
    Scharinger M; Monahan PJ; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):903-18. PubMed ID: 22232394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Characterization of cortical auditory evoked potential (P1-N1-P2) in normal hearing young adults].
    Li YL; Liu XH; Fu XX; Qi BE
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 31(4):262-266. PubMed ID: 29871239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term exposure to occupational noise alters the cortical organization of sound processing.
    Brattico E; Kujala T; Tervaniemi M; Alku P; Ambrosi L; Monitillo V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):190-203. PubMed ID: 15589197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiological and phonological change detection measures of auditory word processing in normal Persian-speaking children.
    Ziatabar Ahmadi SZ; Mahmoudian S; Ashayeri H; Allaeddini F; Farhadi M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 90():220-226. PubMed ID: 27729137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M; Kruck S; De Baene W; Schröger E; Alter K; Friederici AD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparisons of auditory brainstem response elicited by compound click-sawtooths sound and synthetic consonant-vowel /da/.
    Lee GS; Chang CW
    Physiol Behav; 2022 Oct; 255():113922. PubMed ID: 35905807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The neural basis of sublexical speech and corresponding nonspeech processing: a combined EEG-MEG study.
    Kuuluvainen S; Nevalainen P; Sorokin A; Mittag M; Partanen E; Putkinen V; Seppänen M; Kähkönen S; Kujala T
    Brain Lang; 2014 Mar; 130():19-32. PubMed ID: 24576806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked M100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds.
    Poeppel D; Yellin E; Phillips C; Roberts TP; Rowley HA; Wexler K; Marantz A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1996 Nov; 4(4):231-42. PubMed ID: 8957564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory categorical processing for speech is modulated by inherent musical listening skills.
    Mankel K; Barber J; Bidelman GM
    Neuroreport; 2020 Jan; 31(2):162-166. PubMed ID: 31834142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of background noise on inter-trial phase coherence and auditory N1-P2 responses to speech stimuli.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():113-9. PubMed ID: 26276419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conceptual relationships between spoken words and environmental sounds: event-related brain potential measures.
    Van Petten C; Rheinfelder H
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Apr; 33(4):485-508. PubMed ID: 7617157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.