BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32103040)

  • 1. The effect of posterior tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: The whole human finite element model analysis.
    Yagi M; Nakahira Y; Watanabe K; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Iwamoto M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3433. PubMed ID: 32103040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of posterior polyester tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: a finite element analysis.
    Bess S; Harris JE; Turner AW; LaFage V; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Schwab FJ; Haid RW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jan; 26(1):125-133. PubMed ID: 27611508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alignment Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and the Effect of Lower Thoracic Junctional Tethers for Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Buell TJ; Chen CJ; Quinn JC; Buchholz AL; Mazur MD; Mullin JP; Nguyen JH; Taylor DG; Bess S; Line BG; Ames CP; Schwab FJ; Lafage V; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 121():e96-e103. PubMed ID: 30217780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevention of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: Are Polyaxial Pedicle Screws Superior to Monoaxial Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Vertebrae?
    Wang H; Ding W; Ma L; Zhang L; Yang D
    World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():405-415. PubMed ID: 28216210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biomechanical study of ligament tethers strengthening for the prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior long-segment spinal fusion.
    Zhao G; Wang X; Liu D; Wu K; Zhao J; Fei W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Apr; 94():105621. PubMed ID: 35299117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Caudally directed upper-instrumented vertebra pedicle screws associated with minimized risk of proximal junctional failure in patients with long posterior spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Harris AB; Kebaish FN; Puvanesarajah V; Raad M; Wilkening MW; Jain A; Cohen DB; Neuman BJ; Kebaish KM
    Spine J; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 33722729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal tether configurations and preload tensioning to prevent proximal junctional kyphosis: a finite element analysis.
    Buell TJ; Bess S; Xu M; Schwab FJ; Lafage V; Ames CP; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(5):574-584. PubMed ID: 30738393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of multilevel posterior ligament dissection after spinal instrumentation on adjacent segment biomechanics as a potential risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis: a biomechanical study.
    Lange T; Schulte TL; Gosheger G; Schulze Boevingloh A; Mayr R; Schmoelz W
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Feb; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 29444669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinically relevant biomechanical properties of three different fixation techniques of the upper instrumented vertebra in deformity surgery.
    Nevzati E; Moser M; Dietz N; Yaszay B; Lenke LG; Farshad M; Arvind V; Cho SK; Spiessberger A
    Spine Deform; 2022 Sep; 10(5):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 35428950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical assessment of proximal junctional semi-rigid fixation in long-segment thoracolumbar constructs.
    Viswanathan VK; Ganguly R; Minnema AJ; DeVries Watson NA; Grosland NM; Fredericks DC; Grossbach AJ; Viljoen SV; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):184-192. PubMed ID: 30497219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The potential of proximal junctional kyphosis prevention using a novel tether pedicle screw construct: an in silico study comparing the influence of standard and dynamic techniques on adjacent-level range of motion and load pattern.
    Decker S; Koller H; Overes T; Montali A; Clin J; Hachem B
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 May; 40(5):611-621. PubMed ID: 38394650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in the Position of the Junctional Vertebrae After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Implication in Risk Assessment of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Development.
    Homans JF; Kruyt MC; Schlösser TPC; Colo D; Rogers K; Shah SA; Flynn JM; Castelein RM; Pasha S
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2020 Feb; 40(2):e84-e90. PubMed ID: 31095012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. T9 versus T10 as the upper instrumented vertebra for correction of adult deformity-rationale and recommendations.
    Hey HWD; Tan KA; Neo CS; Lau ET; Choong DA; Lau LL; Liu GK; Wong HK
    Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):615-621. PubMed ID: 27856380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The unreimbursed costs of preventing revision surgery in adult spinal deformity: analysis of cost-effectiveness of proximal junctional failure prevention with ligament augmentation.
    Safaee MM; Dalle Ore CL; Zygourakis CC; Deviren V; Ames CP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 May; 44(5):E13. PubMed ID: 29712521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prophylactic vertebral cement augmentation at the uppermost instrumented vertebra and rostral adjacent vertebra for the prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure following long-segment fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Ghobrial GM; Eichberg DG; Kolcun JPG; Madhavan K; Lebwohl NH; Green BA; Gjolaj JP
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1499-1505. PubMed ID: 28522402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective assessment of the safety and early outcomes of sublaminar band placement for the prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis.
    Viswanathan VK; Kukreja S; Minnema AJ; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):520-531. PubMed ID: 29424677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical effects of fusion levels on the risk of proximal junctional failure and kyphosis in lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
    Park WM; Choi DK; Kim K; Kim YJ; Kim YH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Dec; 30(10):1162-9. PubMed ID: 26320851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hooks Versus Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison.
    Colantonio DF; Le AH; Pisano AJ; Chung JM; Wagner SC; Fredericks DR; Roach WB; Schlaff C; Dill A; Mauntel TC; Hendershot BD; Helgeson MD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Apr; 48(7):E94-E100. PubMed ID: 36745404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum: a comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae.
    Ha Y; Maruo K; Racine L; Schairer WW; Hu SS; Deviren V; Burch S; Tay B; Chou D; Mummaneni PV; Ames CP; Berven SH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Sep; 19(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 23848349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transverse process hooks at upper instrumented vertebra provide more gradual motion transition than pedicle screws.
    Thawrani DP; Glos DL; Coombs MT; Bylski-Austrow DI; Sturm PF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(14):E826-32. PubMed ID: 24732851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.