These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32103654)

  • 1. Can we use levels of evidence to make a decision?
    Harvey E
    Can J Surg; 2020 Feb; 63(1):E86. PubMed ID: 32103654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Introduction to COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on etiology of observational studies].
    Wang WW; Yang ZR; Zhou QX; Shi SY; Zhang G; Zhan SY; Sun F
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 41(12):2149-2159. PubMed ID: 33378831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies.
    Brooke BS; Schwartz TA; Pawlik TM
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Aug; 156(8):787-788. PubMed ID: 33825847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reaching for the stars - rating the quality of systematic reviews with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2.
    Jung JH; Dahm P
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):717-718. PubMed ID: 30358931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology.
    Dekkers OM; Vandenbroucke JP; Cevallos M; Renehan AG; Altman DG; Egger M
    PLoS Med; 2019 Feb; 16(2):e1002742. PubMed ID: 30789892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available?
    Onukwugha E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 23338964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Not Available].
    Rosén M
    Lakartidningen; 2018 May; 115():. PubMed ID: 29809269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-assessor variability: scant data proves the point.
    Ansell J
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2016 Feb; 58(2):111. PubMed ID: 26800501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interim monitoring of nonrandomized prospective studies that invoke propensity scoring for decision making.
    DeSantis SM; Swartz MD; Greene TJ; Fox EE; Holcomb JB; Wade CE;
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2020 Feb; 88(2):e46-e52. PubMed ID: 31996656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Valuable pieces of the clinical decision-making puzzle.
    Szekeres M; Valdes K
    J Hand Ther; 2019; 32(2):139-140. PubMed ID: 31171083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some common, fatal flaws in systematic reviews of observational studies.
    Wilkinson J; Stocking K
    Fertil Steril; 2024 Jun; 121(6):918-920. PubMed ID: 38309515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing Waste and Increasing the Usability of Psychiatry Research: The Family of EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines and One of Its Newest Members: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.
    Thombs BD; Levis B; Rice DB; Wu Y; Benedetti A
    Can J Psychiatry; 2018 Aug; 63(8):509-512. PubMed ID: 29695166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving Reporting Quality in Ophthalmologic Observational Studies That Use Big Data: The Case of Retinal Detachment Associated With Fluoroquinolone Use.
    Etminan M; Maberley DAL
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(6):611-612. PubMed ID: 29710207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Paul M; Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Mar; 27(3):311-314. PubMed ID: 33217559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study Design in Neurosurgical Research: Considerations for Observational and Experimental Cohort Studies.
    Louie CE; D'Agostino E; Woods A; Ryken T
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31552423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis: mistake or milestone in medicine?
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Alba AC; Ross H
    Heart; 2018 Oct; 104(19):1559-1561. PubMed ID: 29602884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moose on the loose: checklist for meta-analyses of observational studies.
    van Zuuren EJ; Fedorowicz Z
    Br J Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 175(5):853-854. PubMed ID: 27790686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations.
    Mueller M; D'Addario M; Egger M; Cevallos M; Dekkers O; Mugglin C; Scott P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 29783954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews and cancer research: a suggested stepwise approach.
    Kelley GA; Kelley KS
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):246. PubMed ID: 29499652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes.
    Annane D; Jaeschke R; Guyatt G
    Intensive Care Med; 2018 Apr; 44(4):512-514. PubMed ID: 29663046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.