These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32104963)

  • 1. Title analysis of (systematic) scoping review studies: Chaos or consistency?
    Chrastina J
    Nurs Health Sci; 2020 Sep; 22(3):557-562. PubMed ID: 32104963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.
    Colquhoun HL; Levac D; O'Brien KK; Straus S; Tricco AC; Perrier L; Kastner M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1291-4. PubMed ID: 25034198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward a framework for the design, implementation, and reporting of methodology scoping reviews.
    Martin GP; Jenkins DA; Bull L; Sisk R; Lin L; Hulme W; Wilson A; Wang W; Barrowman M; Sammut-Powell C; Pate A; Sperrin M; Peek N;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():191-197. PubMed ID: 32726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information content in Medline record fields.
    Kostoff RN; Block JA; Stump JA; Pfeil KM
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Jun; 73(6):515-27. PubMed ID: 15171980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
    Pham MT; Rajić A; Greig JD; Sargeant JM; Papadopoulos A; McEwen SA
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):371-85. PubMed ID: 26052958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scoping Review on Rehabilitation Scoping Reviews.
    Colquhoun HL; Jesus TS; O'Brien KK; Tricco AC; Chui A; Zarin W; Lillie E; Hitzig SL; Seaton S; Engel L; Rotenberg S; Straus SE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 101(8):1462-1469. PubMed ID: 32325163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps.
    O'Brien KK; Colquhoun H; Levac D; Baxter L; Tricco AC; Straus S; Wickerson L; Nayar A; Moher D; O'Malley L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():305. PubMed ID: 27461419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of the nature and level of trust between patients and healthcare providers, its dimensions and determinants: a scoping review protocol.
    Rasiah S; Jaafar S; Yusof S; Ponnudurai G; Chung KPY; Amirthalingam SD
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e028061. PubMed ID: 31980505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
    Munn Z; Peters MDJ; Stern C; Tufanaru C; McArthur A; Aromataris E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 30453902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.
    Davis K; Drey N; Gould D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1386-400. PubMed ID: 19328488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Central themes, core concepts and knowledge gaps concerning social media use, and mental health and well-being among adolescents: a protocol of a scoping review of published literature.
    Schønning V; Aarø LE; Skogen JC
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e031105. PubMed ID: 31992603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: Adaptations and recommendations.
    Schultz A; Goertzen L; Rothney J; Wener P; Enns J; Halas G; Katz A
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 29032590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mismatches in the production of a scoping review: Highlighting the interplay of (in)formalities.
    Sager M; Pistone I
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 31368185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews.
    Colquhoun HL; Jesus TS; O'Brien KK; Tricco AC; Chui A; Zarin W; Lillie E; Hitzig SL; Straus S
    Clin Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 31(9):1249-1256. PubMed ID: 28118743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
    Peters MD; Godfrey CM; Khalil H; McInerney P; Parker D; Soares CB
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 26134548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users.
    Khalil H; Bennett M; Godfrey C; McInerney P; Munn Z; Peters M
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2020 Mar; 18(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 31567603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process.
    Peterson J; Pearce PF; Ferguson LA; Langford CA
    J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2017 Jan; 29(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27245885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews.
    Khalil H; Peters M; Godfrey CM; McInerney P; Soares CB; Parker D
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Apr; 13(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 26821833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.