These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32105143)

  • 1. Speech spoken by familiar people is more resistant to interference by linguistically similar speech.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1465-1476. PubMed ID: 32105143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech-evoked brain activity is more robust to competing speech when it is spoken by someone familiar.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118107. PubMed ID: 33933598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefit to speech intelligibility of hearing a familiar voice.
    Domingo Y; Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Jun; 26(2):236-247. PubMed ID: 31524431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiar Voices Are More Intelligible, Even if They Are Not Recognized as Familiar.
    Holmes E; Domingo Y; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30096018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How Long Does It Take for a Voice to Become Familiar? Speech Intelligibility and Voice Recognition Are Differentially Sensitive to Voice Training.
    Holmes E; To G; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jun; 32(6):903-915. PubMed ID: 33979256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.
    Calandruccio L; Van Engen K; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1458-71. PubMed ID: 20689024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of long-term target and masker talker familiarity in children's speech-in-speech recognition.
    Flaherty MM
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1369195. PubMed ID: 38784624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The advantage of knowing the talker.
    Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.
    Calandruccio L; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):860-9. PubMed ID: 20707455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using spatial release from masking to estimate the magnitude of the familiar-voice intelligibility benefit.
    Domingo Y; Holmes E; Macpherson E; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3487. PubMed ID: 31795686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring Mandarin Speech Recognition Thresholds Using the Method of Adaptive Tracking.
    Wang Y; Lu Z; Yang X; Liu C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):2009-2017. PubMed ID: 31112665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increase in speech recognition due to linguistic mismatch between target and masker speech: monolingual and simultaneous bilingual performance.
    Calandruccio L; Zhou H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):1089-97. PubMed ID: 24167230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.