177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32105712)
1. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
van Riet PA; Erler NS; Bruno MJ; Cahen DL
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 32583392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tissue amount and diagnostic yield of a novel franseen EUS-FNB and a standard EUS-FNA needle-A randomized controlled study in solid pancreatic lesions.
Kovacevic B; Toxværd A; Klausen P; Larsen MH; Grützmeier S; Detlefsen S; Karstensen JG; Brink L; Hassan H; Høgdall E; Vilmann P
Endosc Ultrasound; 2023; 12(3):319-325. PubMed ID: 37693112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?
Li J; Feng J; Gao S; Wang W; Huang L; Yi S; Xu H; Ding XW
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Apr; 43(4):761-770. PubMed ID: 38167820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Colombo M; Ramai D; Mangiavillano B; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Mohan B; Hassan C; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2024 Jan; 56(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 37591258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review.
Verloop CA; Goos JAC; Bruno MJ; Quispel R; van Driel LMJW; Hol L
Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; 99(6):895-911.e13. PubMed ID: 38360118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle with a 22-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a prospective randomized study.
Diehl DL; Sangwan V; Johal AS; Khara HS; Confer B
Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; 99(6):931-937. PubMed ID: 38141686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.
Hikichi T; Hashimoto M; Yanagita T; Kato T; Nakamura J
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2024 Apr; 51(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 37490244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle biopsy versus single-incision with needle knife for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a randomized controlled trial.
Sanaei O; Fernández-Esparrach G; De La Serna-Higuera C; Carrara S; Kumbhari V; El Zein MH; Ismail A; Ginès A; Sendino O; Montenegro A; Repici A; Rahal D; Brewer Gutierrez OI; Moran R; Yang J; Parsa N; Paiji C; Aghaie Meybodi M; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Kalloo AN; Singh VK; Canto MI; Khashab MA
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Mar; 8(3):E266-E273. PubMed ID: 32118100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid on-site evaluation improves the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid pancreatic lesions irrespective of technique: A single-centre experience.
Milluzzo SM; Olivari N; Rossi G; Bianchi D; Liserre B; Graffeo M; Lovera M; Correale L; Hassan C; Spada C
Cytopathology; 2023 Jul; 34(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 37186418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) versus macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: a paired comparative analysis using newer-generation fine needle biopsy needles.
Sundaram S; Chhanchure U; Patil P; Seth V; Mahajan A; Bal M; Kaushal RK; Ramadwar M; Prabhudesai N; Bhandare M; Shrikhande SV; Mehta S
Ann Gastroenterol; 2023; 36(3):340-346. PubMed ID: 37144017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB for diagnosis of solid pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Yao DW; Qin MZ; Jiang HX; Qin SY
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2024 May; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38769625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The yield of cytology and histology obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy needles in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Sbeit W; Abu Hanna N; Alejandro L; Khoury T
Cytopathology; 2024 Jan; 35(1):92-97. PubMed ID: 37698128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration or Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Esposto G; Massimiani G; Galasso L; Santini P; Borriello R; Mignini I; Ainora ME; Nicoletti A; Zileri Dal Verme L; Gasbarrini A; Alfieri S; Quero G; Zocco MA
Cancers (Basel); 2024 Apr; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 38730610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions after previous nondiagnostic or inconclusive sampling.
Lisotti A; Cominardi A; Conti Bellocchi MC; Crinò SF; Larghi A; Facciorusso A; Arcidiacono PG; De Angelis C; Di Matteo FM; Fabbri C; Bertani H; Togliani T; Rizzatti G; Brancaccio M; Grillo A; Fantin A; Pezzoli A; D'Errico F; Amato A; Antonini F; Montale A; Pisani A; Forti E; Manno M; Carrara S; Petrone MC; Binda C; Zagari RM; Fusaroli P;
Dig Endosc; 2024 May; 36(5):615-624. PubMed ID: 37712906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in gallbladder masses.
Tong T; Tian L; Deng MZ; Chen XJ; Fu T; Ma KJ; Xu JH; Wang XY
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2023 Dec; 22(6):632-638. PubMed ID: 35331650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Basic technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid lesions: How many passes?
Petrone MC; Arcidiacono PG
Endosc Ultrasound; 2014 Jan; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 24949407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective evaluation of the resistance forces of 22-gauge EUS-FNA and fine-needle biopsy needles.
Matsunami Y; Itoi T; Tsuchiya T; Ishii K; Tanaka R; Tonozuka R; Mukai S; Nagai K; Yamamoto K; Asai Y; Kurosawa T; Kojima H; Minami H; Homma T; Joyama E; Sofuni A
Endosc Ultrasound; 2023; 12(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 37148137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
