BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32106114)

  • 1. Evaluation of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Nishida T; Kojima T; Kataoka T; Isogai N; Yoshida Y; Nakamura T
    Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(6):541-549. PubMed ID: 32106114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement of Corrected Intraocular Pressure Values Between Corvis ST and Pentacam in Patients With Keratoconus, Subclinical Keratoconus, and Normal Cornea.
    Chen Y; Rong H; Liu W; Liu G; Du B; Jin C; Wei R
    Cornea; 2021 Nov; 40(11):1426-1432. PubMed ID: 33734163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure.
    Ma J; Wang Y; Hao W; Jhanji V
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31432352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of CorvisST biomechanical parameters and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus.
    Shiga S; Kojima T; Nishida T; Nakamura T; Ichikawa K
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 99(6):644-651. PubMed ID: 33326180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal deformation response parameters of dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
    Herber R; Vinciguerra R; Lopes B; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 32050237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of a new intraocular pressure estimate for patients with soft corneas.
    Chen KJ; Eliasy A; Vinciguerra R; Abass A; Lopes BT; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 31326228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early Diagnosis of Keratoconus in Chinese Myopic Eyes by Combining Corvis ST with Pentacam.
    Zhang M; Zhang F; Li Y; Song Y; Wang Z
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):118-123. PubMed ID: 31466466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of Corvis ST Parameters Including Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical, and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes.
    Miao YY; Ma XM; Qu ZX; Eliasy A; Wu BW; Xu H; Wang P; Zheng XB; Wang JJ; Ye YF; Chen SH; Elsheikh A; Bao FJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 258():196-207. PubMed ID: 37879454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
    Ye Y; Yang Y; Fan Y; Lan M; Yu K; Yu M
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.
    Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Bons JP; Hossain A; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Apr; 33(4):266-273. PubMed ID: 28407167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer.
    Ali NQ; Patel DV; McGhee CN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(6):3651-9. PubMed ID: 24833745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus.
    Awad EA; Abou Samra WA; Torky MA; El-Kannishy AM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 28985735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST.
    Eliasy A; Chen KJ; Vinciguerra R; Maklad O; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
    Exp Eye Res; 2018 Oct; 175():98-102. PubMed ID: 29908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiating Keratoconus and Corneal Warpage by Analyzing Focal Change Patterns in Corneal Topography, Pachymetry, and Epithelial Thickness Maps.
    Tang M; Li Y; Chamberlain W; Louie DJ; Schallhorn JM; Huang D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 57(9):OCT544-9. PubMed ID: 27482824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical assessment of healthy and keratoconic corneas (with/without crosslinking) using dynamic ultrahigh-speed Scheimpflug technology and the relevance of the parameter (A1L-A2L).
    Fuchsluger TA; Brettl S; Geerling G; Kaisers W; Franko Zeitz P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 103(4):558-564. PubMed ID: 29871966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea.
    Smedowski A; Weglarz B; Tarnawska D; Kaarniranta K; Wylegala E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 55(2):666-73. PubMed ID: 24425850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.