These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32106227)

  • 1. A framework for testing independence between lane change and cooperative intelligent transportation system.
    Elhenawy M; Glaser S; Bond A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S; Masoud M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229289. PubMed ID: 32106227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lane change warning threshold based on driver perception characteristics.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Fu R; Li Z; Zhang Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():164-174. PubMed ID: 29704793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the safety effects of cooperative intelligent transport systems: A bowtie analysis approach.
    Ehlers UC; Ryeng EO; McCormack E; Khan F; Ehlers S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):125-141. PubMed ID: 27894027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques.
    Das A; Khan MN; Ahmed MM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105578. PubMed ID: 32408143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning-Based Lane-Change Behaviour Detection for Intelligent and Connected Vehicles.
    Du L; Chen W; Pei Z; Zheng H; Fu S; Chen K; Wu D
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():8848363. PubMed ID: 33061950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.
    Jermakian JS; Bao S; Buonarosa ML; Sayer JR; Farmer CM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():65-75. PubMed ID: 28454872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of gender, occupation and experience on behavior while driving on a freeway deceleration lane based on field operational test data.
    Lyu N; Cao Y; Wu C; Xu J; Xie L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():82-93. PubMed ID: 30237046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of blind spot monitoring systems on police-reported lane-change crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(6):615-622. PubMed ID: 29927678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the real-world safety effect of a lane change driver support system and characteristics of lane change crashes based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S104-S111. PubMed ID: 29584482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of driver physical factors leading to unintentional lane departure crashes.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 27740863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.
    Jeong E; Oh C; Lee S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():115-124. PubMed ID: 28499140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems.
    Rahman MM; Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Strawderman L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():361-373. PubMed ID: 28957759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ex-ante assessment of the safety effects of intelligent transport systems.
    Kulmala R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1359-69. PubMed ID: 20441853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of intelligent advanced warnings on drivers negotiating the dilemma zone.
    Gugerty L; McIntyre SE; Link D; Zimmerman K; Tolani D; Huang P; Pokorny RA
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1021-35. PubMed ID: 25277014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
    Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A co-evolutionary lane-changing trajectory planning method for automated vehicles based on the instantaneous risk identification.
    Wu J; Chen X; Bie Y; Zhou W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106907. PubMed ID: 36455450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of traffic conflicts using precise lateral position and width of vehicles for safety assessment.
    Charly A; Mathew TV
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105264. PubMed ID: 31450115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling driver acceptance of driver support systems.
    Rahman MM; Strawderman L; Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Babski-Reeves K; Garrison T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():134-147. PubMed ID: 30245477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.