These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32106332)

  • 1. A primer on strong vs weak control of familywise error rate.
    Proschan MA; Brittain EH
    Stat Med; 2020 Apr; 39(9):1407-1413. PubMed ID: 32106332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size determination with familywise control of both type I and type II errors in clinical trials.
    Wang B; Ting N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(5):951-65. PubMed ID: 26881972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Rejection Principle for Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling Familywise Error Rates.
    Bartroff J; Song J
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2016 Mar; 31(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 26985125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying the generalized partitioning principle to control the generalized familywise error rate.
    Xu H; Hsu J
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):52-67. PubMed ID: 17342949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familywise and per-family error rates of multiple comparison procedures.
    Lawrence J
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(19):3586-3598. PubMed ID: 31099904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online control of the familywise error rate.
    Tian J; Ramdas A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):976-993. PubMed ID: 33413033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A graphical weighted power improving multiplicity correction approach for SNP selections.
    Saunders G; Fu G; Stevens JR
    Curr Genomics; 2014 Oct; 15(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 25435800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiplicity adjustments in testing for bioequivalence.
    Hua SY; Xu S; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 24980563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors.
    Keselman HJ; Miller CW; Holland B
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 22040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On generalized fixed sequence procedures for controlling the FWER.
    Qiu Z; Guo W; Lynch G
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):3968-83. PubMed ID: 26228241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling Type I and II Familywise Error Rates.
    Bartroff J; Song J
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2014 Oct; 153():100-114. PubMed ID: 25092948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of multiplicity adjustment strategies for correlated binary endpoints.
    Leon AC; Heo M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):839-55. PubMed ID: 16080237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A less conservative method to adjust for familywise error rate in neuropsychological research: the Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure.
    Eichstaedt KE; Kovatch K; Maroof DA
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 32(3):693-6. PubMed ID: 23648625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inconsistent use of multiple comparison corrections in studies of population genetic structure: Are some type I errors more tolerable than others?
    Hauser S; Wakeland K; Leberg P
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):144-148. PubMed ID: 30267479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple solution to a common statistical problem: interpreting multiple tests.
    Gordi T; Khamis H
    Clin Ther; 2004 May; 26(5):780-6. PubMed ID: 15220022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiplicity issues in microarray experiments.
    Bretz F; Landgrebe J; Brunner E
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 16113769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On familywise type I error control for multiplicity in equivalence trials with three or more treatments.
    Röhmel J
    Biom J; 2011 Nov; 53(6):914-26. PubMed ID: 22069200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Type I error rates of multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials: strong control and impact of intermediate outcomes.
    Bratton DJ; Parmar MK; Phillips PP; Choodari-Oskooei B
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17(1):309. PubMed ID: 27369182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online error rate control for platform trials.
    Robertson DS; Wason JMS; König F; Posch M; Jaki T
    Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(14):2475-2495. PubMed ID: 37005003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.