BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3210646)

  • 1. [Procedures for the quantitative follow-up control of computerized perimetric findings in glaucoma].
    Grehn F; Burkard G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Nov; 193(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 3210646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quantification and progression of the visual field defect in glaucoma without hypertension, glaucoma simplex and pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Delta Program of the 201 Octopus perimeter].
    Gramer E; Althaus G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Sep; 191(3):184-98. PubMed ID: 3682683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Graphic analysis of topographic trends in perimetry follow-up of glaucoma].
    Weber J; Krieglstein GK; Papoulis C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 Nov; 195(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 2601277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [White-noise field campimetry before and after artificial increase of intraocular pressure. Possible applications in diagnosis and evaluation of glaucoma].
    Schiefer U; Ulrich WD; Ulrich C; Wilhelm H; Aulhorn E
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):477-88. PubMed ID: 1486264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry].
    Schiefer U; Schiller J; Paetzold J; Dietrich TJ; Vonthein R; Besch D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jan; 218(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11225394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Perimetry equivalents of glaucoma progression].
    Weber J
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Jun; 89(3):175-89. PubMed ID: 1303701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Perimetry in the follow-up of glaucoma].
    Gloor B
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1988; 85(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 3065166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Sensitivity of the computer perimeter Competer in early glaucomatous loss of visual field. A controlled study].
    Gramer E; Gerlach R; Krieglstein GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1982 Mar; 180(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 7078010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Sensitivity of noise field campimetry as a screening method for glaucoma].
    Gramer E; Roesen B; Siebert M
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 1757045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
    Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
    Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Progression of glaucomatous visual field damage--a clinical study with the Delta program of the Octopus Perimeter 201 in assessing the effect of early damage on visual field loss in glaucoma simplex].
    Gramer E; Althaus G
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1988; 85(6):620-5. PubMed ID: 3220373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Perception of the blind spot with Rauschfeld campimetry. An additional diagnostic criterion in papillary changes].
    Aulhorn E; Schiefer U; Herzau V
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 2272585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Documentation of glaucomatous visual field defects in threshold and suprathreshold perimetry].
    Stark H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Mar; 200(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 1578877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term fluctuations versus actual field loss in glaucoma patients.
    Gloor BP; Vökt BA
    Dev Ophthalmol; 1985; 12():48-69. PubMed ID: 3839760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-assisted interpretation of visual fields in glaucoma.
    Asman P
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1992; (206):1-47. PubMed ID: 1467748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retesting visual fields: utilizing prior information to decrease test-retest variability in glaucoma.
    Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1627-34. PubMed ID: 17389493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [What do glaucomatous visual fields really look like?].
    Stürmer J; Gloor B; Tobler HJ
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 May; 184(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 6547754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Indications for stimulus 3 and 5 in automatic perimetry. Preliminary results].
    Zulauf M; Caprioli J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May; 204(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 8051884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.