These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32106781)

  • 1. How "none of the above" (NOTA) affects the accessibility of tested and related information in multiple-choice questions.
    Blendermann MF; Little JL; Gray KM
    Memory; 2020 Apr; 28(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 32106781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing multiple-choice tests as tools for learning.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 25123774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting.
    Little JL; Bjork EL; Bjork RA; Angello G
    Psychol Sci; 2012; 23(11):1337-44. PubMed ID: 23034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "None of the above" as a correct and incorrect alternative on a multiple-choice test: implications for the testing effect.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD
    Memory; 2007 Nov; 15(8):873-85. PubMed ID: 17965982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Using None-of-the-Above (NOTA) Hurt Students' Confidence?
    Little JL
    J Intell; 2023 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 37623540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests.
    Smith MA; Karpicke JD
    Memory; 2014; 22(7):784-802. PubMed ID: 24059563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of retrieval in answering multiple-choice questions.
    Little JL; Frickey EA; Fung AK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1473-1485. PubMed ID: 30113206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1085-101. PubMed ID: 27177505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.
    Marsh EJ; Fazio LK; Goswick AE
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):899-906. PubMed ID: 22891857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing.
    Butler AC; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 18491500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.
    Marsh EJ; Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19309212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All of the above: When multiple correct response options enhance the testing effect.
    Bishara AJ; Lanzo LA
    Memory; 2015; 23(7):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25122187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The dark side of corrective feedback: Controlled and automatic influences of retrieval practice.
    Alamri A; Higham PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 May; 48(5):752-768. PubMed ID: 35389700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can Multiple-Choice Testing Induce Desirable Difficulties? Evidence from the Laboratory and the Classroom.
    Bjork EL; Soderstrom NC; Little JL
    Am J Psychol; 2015; 128(2):229-39. PubMed ID: 26255442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pretesting versus posttesting: Comparing the pedagogical benefits of errorful generation and retrieval practice.
    Pan SC; Sana F
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):237-257. PubMed ID: 33793291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):918-28. PubMed ID: 18605878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do Students Regulate Their Use of Multiple Choice Practice Tests?
    Badali S; Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    Educ Psychol Rev; 2023; 35(2):43. PubMed ID: 37013110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.
    Pan SC; Lovelett J; Stoeckenius D; Rickard TC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 30937830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.