These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32107089)
1. Targeted Biopsy With Reduced Number of Cores: Optimal Sampling Scheme in Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy. Shen WW; Cui LG; Ran WQ; Sun Y; Jiang J; Pei XL; Chen W Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 May; 46(5):1197-1207. PubMed ID: 32107089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal sampling scheme in men with abnormal multiparametric MRI undergoing MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Freifeld Y; Xi Y; Passoni N; Woldu S; Hornberger B; Goldberg K; Bagrodia A; Raj G; Margulis V; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I; G Roehrborn C; Costa DN Urol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 37(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 30446460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5]. Liu Y; Yuan CW; Wu JY; Shen Q; Xiao JX; Zhao Z; Wang XY; Li XS; He ZS; Zhou LQ Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):812-817. PubMed ID: 37807733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI-RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate. Liu Y; Wang S; Xu G; Zhou B; Zhang Y; Ye B; Xiang L; Zhang Y; Xu H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 58(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 36773016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy. Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adding systematic biopsy to magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in men with previous negative biopsy or enrolled in active surveillance programs: A prospective single center, randomized study. Porreca A; Del Giudice F; Giampaoli M; D'Agostino D; Romagnoli D; Corsi P; Del Rosso A; Maggi M; Chung BI; Ferro M; de Cobelli O; Lucarelli G; Schiavina R; De Berardinis E; Sciarra A; Busetto GM Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(37):e22059. PubMed ID: 32925739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy. Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Fourcade A; Payrard C; Tissot V; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Demany N; Serey-Effeil S; Callerot P; Coquet JB; Doucet L; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Nonent M; Fournier G; Valeri A Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):174-179. PubMed ID: 29463177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates. Dahl DM; Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):451.e9-451.e14. PubMed ID: 36008257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy. Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI. Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy Strategies: Sparing the Multiparametric MRI-Negative Transitional Zone in Presence of Exclusively Peripheral Multiparametric MRI-Suspect Lesions. Kachanov M; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Roberts MJ; Sauer M; Beyersdorff D; Boiko S; Maurer T; Steuber T; Graefen M; Budäus L J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 34555925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy combined with standard template improves perineural invasion detection. Wu CL; Kim M; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Dahl DM Hum Pathol; 2021 Nov; 117():101-107. PubMed ID: 34461132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy. Mannaerts CK; Engelbrecht MRW; Postema AW; van Kollenburg RAA; Hoeks CMA; Savci-Heijink CD; Van Sloun RJG; Wildeboer RR; De Reijke TM; Mischi M; Wijkstra H BJU Int; 2020 Oct; 126(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 32315112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection. Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography Fusion Prostate Biopsy Significantly Outperforms Systematic 12-Core Biopsy for Prediction of Total Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tumor Volume in Active Surveillance Patients. Okoro C; George AK; Siddiqui MM; Rais-Bahrami S; Walton-Diaz A; Shakir NA; Rothwax JT; Raskolnikov D; Stamatakis L; Su D; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Merino MJ; Parnes HL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA J Endourol; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1115-21. PubMed ID: 25897467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer. Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score. Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy. Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]