These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32107158)

  • 1. Outcomes of Transradial Approach to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis.
    Garg R; Fu D; McRee C; Anderson K; Kennedy K; Aronow HD; Tuohy C; Abbott JD
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1131-1135. PubMed ID: 32107158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bajaj A; Pancholy S; Sothwal A; Nawaz Y; Boruah P
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
    Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radial versus femoral access for left main percutaneous coronary intervention: An analysis from the Veterans Affairs Clinical, Reporting, and Tracking Program.
    Bhardwaj B; Gunzburger E; Valle JA; Grunwald GK; Plomondon ME; Vidovich MI; Aggarwal K; Karuparthi PR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(2):480-488. PubMed ID: 34847279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With History of CABG Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization Via the Radial Versus Femoral Approach.
    Manly DA; Karrowni W; Rymer JA; Kaltenbach LA; Swaminathan RV; Messenger JC; Abbott JD; Seto A; Panetta C; Brilakis E; Nikolakopoulos I; Gilchrist IC; Kaul P; Dakik H; Rao SV
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 14(8):907-916. PubMed ID: 33812824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
    Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Rise of Transradial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Australia.
    Ocsan RJ; Doost A; Marley P; Farshid A
    J Interv Cardiol; 2020; 2020():4397697. PubMed ID: 33312077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
    Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Transradial Approach of Cardiac Catheterization for Patients on Dialysis.
    Kuno T; Hirano K; Imaeda S; Hashimoto K; Ryuzaki T; Saito T; Yamazaki H; Tabei R; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 30(6):212-217. PubMed ID: 29335385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Schussler JM; Vasudevan A; von Bose LJ; Won JI; McCullough PA
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 27378143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radial versus femoral artery access in patients undergoing PCI for left main coronary artery disease: analysis from the EXCEL trial.
    Chen S; Redfors B; Liu Y; Ben-Yehuda O; Morice MC; Leon MB; Kandzari DE; Mehran R; Lembo NJ; Banning AP; Merkely B; Kappetein AP; Sabik JF; Serruys PW; Stone GW
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Nov; 14(10):1104-1111. PubMed ID: 30111521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Access Site Choice on Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Pancholy MS; Skelding K; Scott T; Blankenship J; Pancholy SB
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(12):2141-2145. PubMed ID: 29100589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
    Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Access Site on Periprocedural Bleeding and Cerebral and Coronary Events in High-Bleeding-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings from the RIVA-PCI Trial.
    Borlich M; Zeymer U; Wienbergen H; Hobbach HP; Cuneo A; Bekeredjian R; Ritter O; Hailer B; Hertting K; Hennersdorf M; Scholtz W; Lanzer P; Mudra H; Schwefer M; Schwimmbeck PL; Liebetrau C; Thiele H; Claas C; Riemer T; Zahn R; Iden L; Richardt G; Toelg R
    Cardiol Ther; 2024 Mar; 13(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 38055177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics and outcome in cardiogenic shock according to vascular access site for percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Peters EJ; Bogerd M; Ten Berg S; Timmermans MJC; Engström AE; Thiele H; Jung C; Schrage B; Sjauw KD; Verouden NJW; Teeuwen K; Dedic A; Meuwissen M; Danse PW; Claessen BEPM; Henriques JPS;
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2024 Aug; 13(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 38920350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery via transradial approach feasible for skilled transfemoral operators? Initial experience in an unselected population.
    Tomassini F; Gagnor A; Montali N; Gambino A; Bollati M; Infantino V; Tizzani E; Varbella F
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 23768506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention types, trends, and outcomes according to vascular access site.
    Shamkhani W; Moledina S; Rashid M; Mamas MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Nov; 102(5):803-813. PubMed ID: 37750228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
    Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Brousseau-Provencher C; Montminy S; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Bataille Y; Molin P; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Roy L; Larose É; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24139933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.