These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Environmental DNA of insects and springtails from caves reveals complex processes of eDNA transfer in soils. Lunghi E; Valle B; Guerrieri A; Bonin A; Cianferoni F; Manenti R; Ficetola GF Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154022. PubMed ID: 35202680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Concurrent visual encounter sampling validates eDNA selectivity and sensitivity for the endangered wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta). Akre TS; Parker LD; Ruther E; Maldonado JE; Lemmon L; McInerney NR PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215586. PubMed ID: 31017960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Combining surface and soil environmental DNA with artificial cover objects to improve terrestrial reptile survey detection. Kyle KE; Allen MC; Dragon J; Bunnell JF; Reinert HK; Zappalorti R; Jaffe BD; Angle JC; Lockwood JL Conserv Biol; 2022 Dec; 36(6):e13939. PubMed ID: 35603473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis. Bessey C; Neil Jarman S; Simpson T; Miller H; Stewart T; Kenneth Keesing J; Berry O Commun Biol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):236. PubMed ID: 33619330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. McClenaghan B; Fahner N; Cote D; Chawarski J; McCarthy A; Rajabi H; Singer G; Hajibabaei M PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0236540. PubMed ID: 33147221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predicting provenance of forensic soil samples: Linking soil to ecological habitats by metabarcoding and supervised classification. Fløjgaard C; Frøslev TG; Brunbjerg AK; Bruun HH; Moeslund J; Hansen AJ; Ejrnæs R PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0202844. PubMed ID: 31283764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Seasonal dynamics of riverine fish communities using eDNA. Milhau T; Valentini A; Poulet N; Roset N; Jean P; Gaboriaud C; Dejean T J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb; 98(2):387-398. PubMed ID: 31674010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey. Johnson MD; Fokar M; Cox RD; Barnes MA BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 34872490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods. Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Planktonic foraminifera eDNA signature deposited on the seafloor remains preserved after burial in marine sediments. Barrenechea Angeles I; Lejzerowicz F; Cordier T; Scheplitz J; Kucera M; Ariztegui D; Pawlowski J; Morard R Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20351. PubMed ID: 33230106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA. McClenaghan B; Compson ZG; Hajibabaei M PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0224119. PubMed ID: 32191699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The bug in a teacup-monitoring arthropod-plant associations with environmental DNA from dried plant material. Krehenwinkel H; Weber S; Künzel S; Kennedy SR Biol Lett; 2022 Jun; 18(6):20220091. PubMed ID: 35702982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spider webs as eDNA samplers: Biodiversity assessment across the tree of life. Gregorič M; Kutnjak D; Bačnik K; Gostinčar C; Pecman A; Ravnikar M; Kuntner M Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2534-2545. PubMed ID: 35510791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Drone-assisted collection of environmental DNA from tree branches for biodiversity monitoring. Aucone E; Kirchgeorg S; Valentini A; Pellissier L; Deiner K; Mintchev S Sci Robot; 2023 Jan; 8(74):eadd5762. PubMed ID: 36652506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of soil preservation for biodiversity monitoring using environmental DNA. Guerrieri A; Bonin A; Münkemüller T; Gielly L; Thuiller W; Francesco Ficetola G Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3313-3325. PubMed ID: 33034070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]