These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32108622)

  • 1. A grading dilemma; Gleason scoring system: Are we sufficiently compatible? A multi center study.
    Dere Y; Çelik ÖI; Çelik SY; Ekmekçi S; Evcim G; Pehlivan F; Ağalar A; Deliktaş H; Çulhacı N
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020 Feb; 63(Supplement):S25-S29. PubMed ID: 32108622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
    Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
    Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.
    Singh RV; Agashe SR; Gosavi AV; Sulhyan KR
    Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 22293266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-observer reproducibility before and after web-based education in the Gleason grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma among the Iranian pathologists.
    Abdollahi A; Sheikhbahaei S; Meysamie A; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
    Acta Med Iran; 2014; 52(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 24902017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expected impact of MRI-targeted biopsy interreader variability among uropathologists on ProScreen prostate cancer screening trial: a pre-trial validation study.
    Hietikko R; Mirtti T; Kilpeläinen TP; Tolonen T; Räisänen-Sokolowski A; Nordling S; Hannus J; Laurila M; Taari K; Tammela TLJ; Autio R; Natunen K; Auvinen A; Rannikko A
    World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):217. PubMed ID: 38581590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
    Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays.
    De la Taille A; Viellefond A; Berger N; Boucher E; De Fromont M; Fondimare A; Molinié V; Piron D; Sibony M; Staroz F; Triller M; Peltier E; Thiounn N; Rubin MA
    Hum Pathol; 2003 May; 34(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 12792917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter/intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason scoring in prostate adenocarcinoma in Iranian pathologists.
    Abdollahi A; Meysamie A; Sheikhbahaei S; Ahmadi A; Moradi-Tabriz H; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
    Urol J; 2012; 9(2):486-90. PubMed ID: 22641492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of gleason grading by practicing pathologists and the impact of education on improving agreement.
    Mikami Y; Manabe T; Epstein JI; Shiraishi T; Furusato M; Tsuzuki T; Matsuno Y; Sasano H
    Hum Pathol; 2003 Jul; 34(7):658-65. PubMed ID: 12874761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading in prostate biopsy samples].
    Bori R; Salamon F; Móczár C; Cserni G
    Orv Hetil; 2013 Aug; 154(31):1219-25. PubMed ID: 23895990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.
    Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11172299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of prostate biopsy secondary pathology review on radiotherapy management.
    Siedow M; Eisner M; Yaney A; Washington I; Zynger D; Martin D; Mo X; Diconstanzo D; Diaz DA
    Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 34698410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.
    Kweldam CF; Nieboer D; Algaba F; Amin MB; Berney DM; Billis A; Bostwick DG; Bubendorf L; Cheng L; Compérat E; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Evans AJ; Hansel DE; Humphrey PA; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Tan PH; Varma M; Zhou M; van Leenders GJ
    Histopathology; 2016 Sep; 69(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 27028587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies?
    McLean M; Srigley J; Banerjee D; Warde P; Hao Y
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 1997; 9(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 9315395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interobserver agreement of Gleason score and modified Gleason score in needle biopsy and in surgical specimen of prostate cancer.
    Veloso SG; Lima MF; Salles PG; Berenstein CK; Scalon JD; Bambirra EA
    Int Braz J Urol; 2007; 33(5):639-46; discussion 647-51. PubMed ID: 17980061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The updated grading system of prostate carcinoma: an inter-observer agreement study among general pathologists in an academic practice.
    Al Nemer AM; Elsharkawy T; Elshawarby M; Al-Tamimi D; Kussaibi H; Ahmed A
    APMIS; 2017 Nov; 125(11):957-961. PubMed ID: 28913842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.