These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32108622)

  • 21. [Reproducibility of malignancy grading in prostatic cancers using the Gleason-Böckling system].
    Kiss F; Lakner G; Csellár M; Nagy P; Tóth A; Vittay G
    Orv Hetil; 1997 May; 138(19):1195-9. PubMed ID: 9235527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
    Egevad L; Ahmad AS; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Griffiths D; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Moss S; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M; Camparo P
    Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 23240715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors.
    Meliti A; Sadimin E; Diolombi M; Khani F; Epstein JI
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):681-685. PubMed ID: 28155999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A UK-based investigation of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies.
    Melia J; Moseley R; Ball RY; Griffiths DF; Grigor K; Harnden P; Jarmulowicz M; McWilliam LJ; Montironi R; Waller M; Moss S; Parkinson MC
    Histopathology; 2006 May; 48(6):644-54. PubMed ID: 16681679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving the reproducibility of the Gleason scores in small foci of prostate cancer--suggestion of diagnostic criteria for glandular fusion.
    Helpap B; Kristiansen G; Beer M; Köllermann J; Oehler U; Pogrebniak A; Fellbaum Ch
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2012 Jul; 18(3):615-21. PubMed ID: 22179685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interobserver reproducibility of percent Gleason grade 4/5 in total prostatectomy specimens.
    Glaessgen A; Hamberg H; Pihl CG; Sundelin B; Nilsson B; Egevad L
    J Urol; 2002 Nov; 168(5):2006-10. PubMed ID: 12394696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prognostic significance of histologic grading in patients with prostate carcinoma who are assessed by the Gleason and World Health Organization grading systems in needle biopsies obtained prior to radiotherapy.
    Lilleby W; Torlakovic G; Torlakovic E; Skovlund E; Fosså SD
    Cancer; 2001 Jul; 92(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 11466684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists.
    Bulten W; Balkenhol M; Belinga JA; Brilhante A; Çakır A; Egevad L; Eklund M; Farré X; Geronatsiou K; Molinié V; Pereira G; Roy P; Saile G; Salles P; Schaafsma E; Tschui J; Vos AM; ; van Boven H; Vink R; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van der Kaa C; Litjens G
    Mod Pathol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):660-671. PubMed ID: 32759979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accurate Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsies by general pathologists.
    Renshaw AA; Schultz D; Cote K; Loffredo M; Ziemba DE; D'Amico AV
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):1007-8. PubMed ID: 12873176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Classic and International Society of Urological Pathology 2005 Modified Gleason grading using needle biopsies from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial.
    Lucia MS; Bostwick DG; Somerville MC; Fowler IL; Rittmaster RS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1740-6. PubMed ID: 24283854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interobserver Variability in Scoring Liver Biopsies with a Diagnosis of Alcoholic Hepatitis.
    Horvath B; Allende D; Xie H; Guirguis J; Jeung J; Lapinski J; Patil D; McCullough AJ; Dasarathy S; Liu X
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 Sep; 41(9):1568-1573. PubMed ID: 28654190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bayesian belief network for the Gleason patterns in prostatic adenocarcinoma: development of a diagnostic decision support system for educational purposes.
    Montironi R; Ball RY; Griffiths DF; Grigor K; Harnden PM; Jarmulowicz M; McWilliam LJ; Moseley RP; Parkinson MC; Santinelli A; Moss SM; Melia JW
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2008 Feb; 30(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18459582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
    Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
    Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
    Sauter G; Steurer S; Clauditz TS; Krech T; Wittmer C; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Janssen T; Hakimi N; Simon R; von Petersdorff-Campen M; Jacobsen F; von Loga K; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Haese A; Heinzer H; Beyer B; Graefen M; Michl U; Salomon G; Steuber T; Budäus LH; Hekeler E; Malsy-Mink J; Kutzera S; Fraune C; Göbel C; Huland H; Schlomm T
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 26542947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists.
    Al-Maghrabi JA; Bakshi NA; Farsi HM
    Ann Saudi Med; 2013; 33(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 23458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prostate Cancer: Update on Grading and Reporting.
    Baraban E; Epstein J
    Surg Pathol Clin; 2022 Dec; 15(4):579-589. PubMed ID: 36344176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.