These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32108622)

  • 41. Frequency and determinants of disagreement and error in gleason scores: a population-based study of prostate cancer.
    Goodman M; Ward KC; Osunkoya AO; Datta MW; Luthringer D; Young AN; Marks K; Cohen V; Kennedy JC; Haber MJ; Amin MB
    Prostate; 2012 Sep; 72(13):1389-98. PubMed ID: 22228120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of WHO and Gleason histologic grading systems in prostatic adenocarcinomas.
    Ozdamar SO; Sarikaya S; Yildiz L; Atilla MK; Kandemir B; Yildiz S
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 8738623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
    Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Low Gleason score prostatic adenocarcinomas are no longer viable entities.
    Berney DM
    Histopathology; 2007 May; 50(6):683-90. PubMed ID: 17493232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading: evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays.
    Burchardt M; Engers R; Müller M; Burchardt T; Willers R; Epstein JI; Ackermann R; Gabbert HE; de la Taille A; Rubin MA
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 134(10):1071-8. PubMed ID: 18392850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Improvement of diagnostic agreement among pathologists in resolving an "atypical glands suspicious for cancer" diagnosis in prostate biopsies using a novel "Disease-Focused Diagnostic Review" quality improvement process.
    Shah RB; Leandro G; Romerocaces G; Bentley J; Yoon J; Mendrinos S; Tadros Y; Tian W; Lash R
    Hum Pathol; 2016 Oct; 56():155-62. PubMed ID: 27346573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Use of the Gleason system in international comparisons of prostatic adenocarcinomas in blacks.
    Freeman VL; Coard KC; Wojcik E; Durazo-Arvizu R
    Prostate; 2004 Feb; 58(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 14716742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.
    Berney DM; Algaba F; Camparo P; Compérat E; Griffiths D; Kristiansen G; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Varma M; Egevad L
    Histopathology; 2014 Feb; 64(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 24102975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
    Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Reproducibility of Gleason scores in prostate cancer].
    He HJ; Wang GW
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Jan; 22(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 26931024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
    Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1140-52. PubMed ID: 26756649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diagnosis of Gleason pattern 5 prostate adenocarcinoma on core needle biopsy: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists.
    Shah RB; Li J; Cheng L; Egevad L; Deng FM; Fine SW; Kunju LP; Melamed J; Mehra R; Osunkoya AO; Paner GP; Shen SS; Tsuzuki T; Trpkov K; Tian W; Yang XJ; Zhou M
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1242-9. PubMed ID: 25929349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measuring interobserver variation in a pathology EQA scheme using weighted κ for multiple readers.
    Wright KC; Melia J; Moss S; Berney DM; Coleman D; Harnden P
    J Clin Pathol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1128-31. PubMed ID: 21836039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer: results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists.
    Epstein JI; Allsbrook WC; Amin MB; Egevad LL
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 16462155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading.
    Flach RN; Egevad L; Eklund M; van der Kwast TH; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Suelmann BBM; Willemse PM; Meijer RP; van Diest PJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2023 Dec; 77(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 36328436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer and Gleason grading system.
    Fukagai T; Namiki T; Carlile RG; Sugawara S; Morita M; Shimada M; Yoshida H; Namiki H
    Int J Urol; 2001 Oct; 8(10):539-45; discussion 546-8. PubMed ID: 11737480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning.
    Arvaniti E; Fricker KS; Moret M; Rupp N; Hermanns T; Fankhauser C; Wey N; Wild PJ; Rüschoff JH; Claassen M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12054. PubMed ID: 30104757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Interobserver reproducibility of modified Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Glaessgen A; Hamberg H; Pihl CG; Sundelin B; Nilsson B; Egevad L
    Virchows Arch; 2004 Jul; 445(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15156317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.