226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32108671)
1. Visual Field Plots: A Comparison Study Between Standard Automated Perimetry and Eye Movement Perimetry.
Mazumdar D; Pel JJM; Kadavath Meethal NS; Asokan R; Panday M; Steen JVD; George R
J Glaucoma; 2020 May; 29(5):351-361. PubMed ID: 32108671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening.
Meethal NSK; Pel JJM; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; George R
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 257(6):1277-1287. PubMed ID: 30944987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Saccadic reaction time in mirror image sectors across horizontal meridian in eye movement perimetry.
Mazumdar D; Meethal NSK; George R; Pel JJM
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2630. PubMed ID: 33514780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Achromatic and short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with glaucomatous large cups.
Mansberger SL; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Weinreb RN
Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Nov; 117(11):1473-7. PubMed ID: 10565515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
Bayer AU; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A case control study examining the feasibility of using eye tracking perimetry to differentiate patients with glaucoma from healthy controls.
Tatham AJ; Murray IC; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Fleck BW; Minns RA
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):839. PubMed ID: 33436922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Threshold Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field in Patients With Glaucoma With Mild Visual Loss.
Wall M; Lee EJ; Wanzek RJ; Zamba KD; Turpin A; Chong LX; Marin-Franch I
J Glaucoma; 2019 Nov; 28(11):997-1005. PubMed ID: 31567907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
