226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32108671)
21. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
Bengtsson B
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage.
Soliman MA; de Jong LA; Ismaeil AA; van den Berg TJ; de Smet MD
Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma.
Thulasidas M; Patyal S
J Glaucoma; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 32890104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predicting conversion to glaucoma using standard automated perimetry and frequency doubling technology.
Takahashi G; Demirel S; Johnson CA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 255(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 28110356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of an Age-corrected Normative Database for Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP).
Tatham AJ; McClean P; Murray IC; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Fleck BW; Minns RA
J Glaucoma; 2020 Dec; 29(12):1106-1114. PubMed ID: 33264163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Octopus 900 Automated Kinetic Perimetry versus Standard Automated Static Perimetry in Glaucoma Practice.
Rowe FJ; Czanner G; Somerville T; Sood I; Sood D
Curr Eye Res; 2021 Jan; 46(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 32564629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Kremers J; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Adler W; Tornow RP
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 253(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 25511293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression be Predicted by Structural and Functional Measures?
Schrems WA; Schrems-Hoesl LM; Mardin CY; Laemmer R; Kruse FE; Horn FK
J Glaucoma; 2017 Apr; 26(4):373-382. PubMed ID: 28118204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry.
Katz J; Tielsch JM; Quigley HA; Sommer A
Ophthalmology; 1995 Jan; 102(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 7831036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Repeatability of Online Circular Contrast Perimetry Compared to Standard Automated Perimetry.
Meyerov J; Chen Y; Busija L; Green C; Skalicky SE
J Glaucoma; 2024 Jul; 33(7):505-515. PubMed ID: 38595156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.
Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shimizu K
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25563. PubMed ID: 27149561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Glaucomatous damage patterns by short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in glaucoma suspects.
Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pinilla I; Gonzalvo F; Ferreras A; Honrubia FM
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2002; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11936444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Slowed Saccadic Reaction Times in Seemingly Normal Parts of Glaucomatous Visual Fields.
Thepass G; Lemij HG; Vermeer KA; van der Steen J; Pel JJM
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():679297. PubMed ID: 34513866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma.
Turalba AV; Grosskreutz C
Semin Ophthalmol; 2010; 25(5-6):309-16. PubMed ID: 21091017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The ability of short-wavelength automated perimetry to predict conversion to glaucoma.
van der Schoot J; Reus NJ; Colen TP; Lemij HG
Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19896194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Relationship between standard automated perimetry and retinal nerve fiber layer parameters obtained with optical coherence tomography.
Lopez-Peña MJ; Ferreras A; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pablo LE
J Glaucoma; 2011 Sep; 20(7):422-32. PubMed ID: 21278593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
