295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32109850)
1. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.
Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C
Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study.
Alfonzo E; Wallin E; Ekdahl L; Staf C; Rådestad AF; Reynisson P; Stålberg K; Falconer H; Persson J; Dahm-Kähler P
Eur J Cancer; 2019 Jul; 116():169-177. PubMed ID: 31200323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nationwide Introduction of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Its Association With Severe Complications.
Jørgensen SL; Mogensen O; Wu C; Lund K; Iachina M; Korsholm M; Jensen PT
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jun; 154(6):530-538. PubMed ID: 30810740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival after a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based prospective cohort study.
Jørgensen SL; Mogensen O; Wu CS; Korsholm M; Lund K; Jensen PT
Eur J Cancer; 2019 Mar; 109():1-11. PubMed ID: 30654224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The early surgical period in robotic radical hysterectomy is related to the recurrence after surgery in stage IB cervical cancer.
Paek J; Lim PC
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(12):2697-2704. PubMed ID: 34104102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Melamed A; Margul DJ; Chen L; Keating NL; Del Carmen MG; Yang J; Seagle BL; Alexander A; Barber EL; Rice LW; Wright JD; Kocherginsky M; Shahabi S; Rauh-Hain JA
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 30379613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends and survival outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for stage II uterine cancer.
Abel MK; Chan JK; Chow S; Darcy K; Tian C; Kapp DS; Mann AK; Liao CI
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1347-1355. PubMed ID: 32753561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The institutional learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study.
Eoh KJ; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
BMC Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32093687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
