These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32109999)
1. Do Preferred Risk Formats Lead to Better Understanding? A Multicenter Controlled Trial on Communicating Familial Breast Cancer Risks Using Different Risk Formats. Henneman L; van Asperen CJ; Oosterwijk JC; Menko FH; Claassen L; Timmermans DR Patient Prefer Adherence; 2020; 14():333-342. PubMed ID: 32109999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial. Henneman L; Oosterwijk JC; van Asperen CJ; Menko FH; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Kostense PJ; Claassen L; Timmermans DR BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2013 Apr; 13():55. PubMed ID: 23627498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design of the BRISC study: a multicentre controlled clinical trial to optimize the communication of breast cancer risks in genetic counselling. Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L; van Asperen CJ; Oosterwijk JC; Menko FH; Timmermans DR BMC Cancer; 2008 Oct; 8():283. PubMed ID: 18834503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Talking About Chance": The Presentation of Risk Information During Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Hallowell N; Statham H; Murton F; Green J; Richards M J Genet Couns; 1997 Sep; 6(3):269-86. PubMed ID: 26142235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt? Barnes AJ; Hanoch Y; Miron-Shatz T; Ozanne EM Health Psychol; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1007-16. PubMed ID: 27183307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical geneticists' and genetic counselors' views on the communication of genetic risks: a qualitative study. Henneman L; Marteau TM; Timmermans DR Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Oct; 73(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 18583088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A focus group study on breast cancer risk presentation: one format does not fit all. Dorval M; Bouchard K; Chiquette J; Glendon G; Maugard CM; Dubuisson W; Panchal S; Simard J Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Jul; 21(7):719-24. PubMed ID: 23169493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absolute risk representation in cardiovascular disease prevention: comprehension and preferences of health care consumers and general practitioners involved in a focus group study. Hill S; Spink J; Cadilhac D; Edwards A; Kaufman C; Rogers S; Ryan R; Tonkin A BMC Public Health; 2010 Mar; 10():108. PubMed ID: 20199692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences. Price M; Cameron R; Butow P Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial cancer genetic counseling consultation: change in counselees' cognitions and anxiety, and association with addressing their needs and preferences. Pieterse AH; Ausems MG; Van Dulmen AM; Beemer FA; Bensing JM Am J Med Genet A; 2005 Aug; 137(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 16007615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do women understand the odds? Risk perceptions and recall of risk information in women with a family history of breast cancer. Hopwood P; Howell A; Lalloo F; Evans G Community Genet; 2003; 6(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15331867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information. Ulph F; Townsend E; Glazebrook C BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19500337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Presenting health risk information in different formats: the effect on participants' cognitive and emotional evaluation and decisions. Timmermans DR; Ockhuysen-Vermey CF; Henneman L Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18722073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic clinicians' confidence in BOADICEA comprehensive breast cancer risk estimates and counselees' psychosocial outcomes: A prospective study. Brédart A; De Pauw A; Tüchler A; Lakeman IMM; Anota A; Rhiem K; Schmutzler R; van Asperen CJ; Devilee P; Stoppa-Lyonnet D; Kop JL; Dolbeault S Clin Genet; 2022 Jul; 102(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 35508697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does enhanced information at cancer genetic counseling improve counselees' knowledge, risk perception, satisfaction and negotiation of information to at-risk relatives?--a randomized study. Roshanai AH; Rosenquist R; Lampic C; Nordin K Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(7):999-1009. PubMed ID: 19636983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice. Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A counselee-oriented perspective on risk communication in genetic counseling: explaining the inaccuracy of the counselees' risk perception shortly after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure. Vos J; Stiggelbout AM; Oosterwijk J; Gomez-Garcia E; Menko F; Collee JM; van Asperen CJ; Tibben A Genet Med; 2011 Sep; 13(9):800-11. PubMed ID: 21885922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating a combined (frequency and percentage) risk expression to communicate information on medicine side effects to patients. Knapp P; Gardner P; McMillan B; Raynor DK; Woolf E Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Aug; 21(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 23419135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk communication in completed series of breast cancer genetic counseling visits. Pieterse AH; van Dulmen S; van Dijk S; Bensing JM; Ausems MG Genet Med; 2006 Nov; 8(11):688-96. PubMed ID: 17108760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy. Albers EAC; Fraterman I; Walraven I; Wilthagen E; Schagen SB; van der Ploeg IM; Wouters MWJM; van de Poll-Franse LV; de Ligt KM J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Mar; 6(1):18. PubMed ID: 35239055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]