These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32111283)

  • 1. Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts.
    Reid CA; Howes LM
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):108-119. PubMed ID: 32111283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Formulation and communication of evaluative forensic science expert opinion-A GHEP-ISFG contribution to the establishment of standards.
    Amorim A; Crespillo M; Luque JA; Prieto L; Garcia O; Gusmão L; Aler M; Barrio PA; Saragoni VG; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():210-213. PubMed ID: 27690358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends and issues in the communication of forensic science.
    Howes LM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Nov; 304():109967. PubMed ID: 31629557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices.
    Bali AS; Edmond G; Ballantyne KN; Kemp RI; Martire KA
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 32381238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.
    McQuiston-Surrett D; Saks MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):436-53. PubMed ID: 19259800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The forensic expert witness--an issue of competency.
    Hiss J; Freund M; Kahana T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(2-3):89-94. PubMed ID: 16842948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stop needless dispute of science in the courts.
    Neuberger D
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7592):9. PubMed ID: 26935661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice.
    Krauss DA; Scurich N
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23613165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility.
    McCarthy Wilcox A; NicDaeid N
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():100-108. PubMed ID: 30216840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
    Kassirer JP; Cecil JS
    JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.
    Edmond G
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Evidence on Animal Cruelty Prosecution and Case Outcomes: Results of a Survey.
    Lockwood R; Touroo R; Olin J; Dolan E
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Nov; 64(6):1687-1692. PubMed ID: 31116432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical evidence and proof of cause of death in Nigerian courts.
    Obafunwa JO; Ajayi O; Okoye MI
    Med Sci Law; 2018 Apr; 58(2):122-134. PubMed ID: 29381106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The judicial view of bitemarks within the United States Criminal Justice System.
    Pretty IA; Sweet DJ
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Jun; 24(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16783949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Of earprints, fingerprints, scent dogs, cot deaths and cognitive contamination--a brief look at the present state of play in the forensic arena.
    Broeders AP
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 159(2-3):148-57. PubMed ID: 16226860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
    Grivas CR; Komar DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forensic science: A judicial perspective.
    Rakoff JS; Liu G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301838120. PubMed ID: 37782784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.