These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32112)
1. Comparative IUD study: Lippes Loop D, Dalkon Shield and TCu-200. Medel M; Martinez C; Morehead JE; Osorio A; Pastene L; Rivera M; Zipper J Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1978-1979; 16(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 32112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative quantitation of menstrual blood loss with the Lippes Loop, Dalkon Shield, and copper T intrauterine devices. Israel R; Shaw ST; Martin MA Contraception; 1974 Jul; 10(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 4442266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Martorella LA; Esposito JM J Reprod Med; 1975 Apr; 14(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 1142352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Dalkon Shield, the TCu 200, and the TCu 380A in private practice. Thomas WO Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1977; 44():78-85. PubMed ID: 335580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems. Sivin I Contraception; 1993 Jul; 48(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8403900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings. Mumford SD; Kessel E Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of continuation rates of intrauterine devices. Measham AR; Villegas A Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep; 48(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 948377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An association between the Dalkon Shield and complicated pregnancies among women hospitalized for intrauterine contraceptive device--related disorders. Kahn HS; Tyler CW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 125(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 1275008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term use of intrauterine contraceptive devices in a private practice. Sandmire HF; Cavanaugh RA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 152(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 3923835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Copper T 220C: a new long-acting copper intrauterine contraceptive device. Cooper DL; Millen AK; Mishell DR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jan; 124(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 1247047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term study of the safety of the Dalkon Shield and Gyne-T 200 intrauterine devices. Rioux JE; Cloutier D; Dupont P; Lamonde D CMAJ; 1986 Apr; 134(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 3948091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Long-term experience in intrauterine contraception a comparison between Lippes' loop, Dalcon-shield and copper-t (author's transl)]. Schultze KW Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1980 Feb; 40(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 7364178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Dalkon Shield debate. Goodhue PA Conn Med; 1983 Mar; 47(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 6851548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized comparative study of the copper T 300, Dalkon shield, and Shell Loop in parous women. Cooper DL; Israel R; Mishell DR Obstet Gynecol; 1975 May; 45(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 1124175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]