143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32112096)
1. GATE MODELING OF LATERAL SCATTERING OF PROTON PENCIL BEAMS.
Zarifi S; Ahangari HT; Jia SB; Tajik-Mansoury MA; Najafzadeh M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 32112096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of GATE-RTion (GATE/Geant4) Monte Carlo simulation settings for proton pencil beam scanning quality assurance.
Winterhalter C; Taylor M; Boersma D; Elia A; Guatelli S; Mackay R; Kirkby K; Maigne L; Ivanchenko V; Resch AF; Sarrut D; Sitch P; Vidal M; Grevillot L; Aitkenhead A
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5817-5828. PubMed ID: 32967037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single pencil beam benchmark of a module for Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport in the PENELOPE code.
Verbeek N; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Smyczek S; Timmermann B; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):456-476. PubMed ID: 33217026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended in-field and out-of-field validation of a compact Monte Carlo model of an IBA PROTEUS
Colson D; Blommaert J; Poels K; De Saint-Hubert M; Reniers B; Depuydt T
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(21):. PubMed ID: 37844576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Lii M; Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Bues M; Song X; Zhang X; Li Y; Ciangaru G; Li H; Taylor MB; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723. PubMed ID: 23556893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental characterization of lateral profiles of scanned proton and carbon ion pencil beams for improved beam models in ion therapy treatment planning.
Schwaab J; Brons S; Fieres J; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 56(24):7813-27. PubMed ID: 22112370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oblique incidence for broad monoenergetic proton beams.
Jette D; Yuan J; Chen W
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5683-90. PubMed ID: 21158280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of electromagnetic and nuclear scattering models in GATE/Geant4 for proton therapy.
Resch AF; Elia A; Fuchs H; Carlino A; Palmans H; Stock M; Georg D; Grevillot L
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2444-2456. PubMed ID: 30870583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.
Sawakuchi GO; Mirkovic D; Perles LA; Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Ciangaru G; Suzuki K; Gillin MT; Mohan R; Titt U
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70. PubMed ID: 20964215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine.
Kugel F; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Janson M; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Behrends C; Verbeek N; Looe HK; Poppe B; Timmermann B
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 36577626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experiments and Monte Carlo simulations on multiple Coulomb scattering of protons.
Verbeek N; Wulff J; Janson M; Bäumer C; Zahid S; Timmermann B; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3186-3199. PubMed ID: 33772808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate proton treatment planning for pencil beam crossing titanium fixation implants.
Righetto R; Clemens LP; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Algranati C; Tommasino F; Dionisi F; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M; Farace P
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():28-38. PubMed ID: 31954210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
