BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32112492)

  • 1. A need for speed in Bayesian population models: a practical guide to marginalizing and recovering discrete latent states.
    Yackulic CB; Dodrill M; Dzul M; Sanderlin JS; Reid JA
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Jul; 30(5):e02112. PubMed ID: 32112492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bayesian approach to the multistate Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model.
    Dupuis JA; Schwarz CJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1015-22. PubMed ID: 17501941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture.
    Glennie R; Borchers DL; Murchie M; Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1345-1355. PubMed ID: 31045249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population size and stopover duration estimation using mark-resight data and Bayesian analysis of a superpopulation model.
    Lyons JE; Kendall WL; Royle JA; Converse SJ; Andres BA; Buchanan JB
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):262-71. PubMed ID: 26348116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models.
    Royle JA; Kéry M
    Ecology; 2007 Jul; 88(7):1813-23. PubMed ID: 17645027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A temporally stratified extension of space-for-time Cormack-Jolly-Seber for migratory animals.
    Hance DJ; Perry RW; Plumb JM; Pope AC
    Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):900-912. PubMed ID: 31729008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cormack-Jolly-Seber model with environmental covariates: a P-spline approach.
    Stoklosa J; Huggins RM
    Biom J; 2012 Nov; 54(6):861-74. PubMed ID: 23027314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.
    McClintock BT
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 5(21):4920-31. PubMed ID: 26640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the size of a closed population by modeling latent and observed heterogeneity.
    Bartolucci F; Forcina A
    Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38536746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum likelihood estimation for model Mt,α for capture-recapture data with misidentification.
    Vale RT; Fewster RM; Carroll EL; Patenaude NJ
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):962-71. PubMed ID: 24942186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient estimation of abundance for patchily distributed populations via two-phase, adaptive sampling.
    Conroy MJ; Runge JP; Barker RJ; Schofield MR; Fonnesbeck CJ
    Ecology; 2008 Dec; 89(12):3362-70. PubMed ID: 19137943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian Comparison of Latent Variable Models: Conditional Versus Marginal Likelihoods.
    Merkle EC; Furr D; Rabe-Hesketh S
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):802-829. PubMed ID: 31297664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating population size: The importance of model and estimator choice.
    Schofield MR; Barker RJ; Link WA; Pavanato H
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3803-3817. PubMed ID: 36654190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival of bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, estimated from 1981-1998 photoidentification data.
    Zeh J; Poole D; Miller G; Koski W; Baraff L; Rugh D
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):832-40. PubMed ID: 12495137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A class of latent Markov models for capture-recapture data allowing for time, heterogeneity, and behavior effects.
    Bartolucci F; Pennoni F
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):568-78. PubMed ID: 17688509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comment on priors for Bayesian occupancy models.
    Northrup JM; Gerber BD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192819. PubMed ID: 29481554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: frequentist versus Bayesian estimation.
    Depaoli S
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):186-219. PubMed ID: 23527607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of globally obtained informative priors on bayesian safety performance functions developed for Australian crash data.
    Afghari AP; Haque MM; Washington S; Smyth T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():55-65. PubMed ID: 31108237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters.
    Beerli P
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 16317072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods for fitting hidden Markov models to multi-state capture-recapture data of invasive carp in the Illinois River.
    Labuzzetta CJ; Coulter AA; Erickson RA
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):2. PubMed ID: 38191559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.