These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32113272)

  • 1. Combining partial information from speech and text.
    Fogerty D; Iftikhar I; Madorskiy R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Feb; 147(2):EL189. PubMed ID: 32113272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition of Interrupted Speech, Text, and Text-Supplemented Speech by Older Adults: Effect of Interruption Rate.
    Fogerty D; Madorskiy R; Vickery B; Shafiro V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Nov; 65(11):4404-4416. PubMed ID: 36251884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.
    Smith KG; Fogerty D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1805-17. PubMed ID: 26536081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of partial information for spoken and written sentence recognition by older listeners.
    Smith KG; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):EL240. PubMed ID: 27369179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.
    Shafiro V; Fogerty D; Smith K; Sheft S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 61(10):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 30458532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Moore AN
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The intelligibility of interrupted speech depends upon its uninterrupted intelligibility.
    Ardoint M; Green T; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):EL275-80. PubMed ID: 25324110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-linguistic Influences on Sentence Accent Detection in Background Noise.
    Scharenborg O; Kakouros S; Post B; Meunier F
    Lang Speech; 2020 Mar; 63(1):3-30. PubMed ID: 30606083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual learning of temporally interrupted spectrally degraded speech.
    Benard MR; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1344. PubMed ID: 25190407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.
    Benard MR; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.
    Kong YY; Jesse A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):373. PubMed ID: 28147573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.
    Shi LF
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24003982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Risley R; Gygi B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):745-56. PubMed ID: 25698009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.
    Stilp C; Donaldson G; Oh S; Kong YY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):3971. PubMed ID: 27908030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.