These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32113361)

  • 1. Predicting NMR relaxation of proteins from molecular dynamics simulations with accurate methyl rotation barriers.
    Hoffmann F; Mulder FAA; Schäfer LV
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Feb; 152(8):084102. PubMed ID: 32113361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accurate Methyl Group Dynamics in Protein Simulations with AMBER Force Fields.
    Hoffmann F; Mulder FAA; Schäfer LV
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 May; 122(19):5038-5048. PubMed ID: 29695158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Narrowing the gap between experimental and computational determination of methyl group dynamics in proteins.
    Hoffmann F; Xue M; Schäfer LV; Mulder FAA
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 Oct; 20(38):24577-24590. PubMed ID: 30226234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probing Methyl Group Dynamics in Proteins by NMR Cross-Correlated Dipolar Relaxation and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Ali AAAI; Hoffmann F; Schäfer LV; Mulder FAA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Dec; 18(12):7722-7732. PubMed ID: 36326619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. General order parameter based correlation analysis of protein backbone motions between experimental NMR relaxation measurements and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Liu Q; Shi C; Yu L; Zhang L; Xiong Y; Tian C
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Feb; 457(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 25600810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of Bond Vector Autocorrelation Functions from Larmor Frequency-Selective Order Parameter Analysis of NMR Relaxation Data.
    Anderson JS; Hernández G; LeMaster DM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jul; 13(7):3276-3289. PubMed ID: 28541675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of force fields on the conformational and dynamic properties of amyloid β(1-40) dimer explored by replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations.
    Watts CR; Gregory A; Frisbie C; Lovas S
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 29235155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fitting Force Field Parameters to NMR Relaxation Data.
    Kümmerer F; Orioli S; Lindorff-Larsen K
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Jun; 19(12):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 37276045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating amber force fields using computed NMR chemical shifts.
    Koes DR; Vries JK
    Proteins; 2017 Oct; 85(10):1944-1956. PubMed ID: 28688107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How does it really move? Recent progress in the investigation of protein nanosecond dynamics by NMR and simulation.
    Stenström O; Champion C; Lehner M; Bouvignies G; Riniker S; Ferrage F
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2022 Dec; 77():102459. PubMed ID: 36148743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the ability of molecular dynamics force fields to recapitulate NMR derived protein side chain order parameters.
    O'Brien ES; Wand AJ; Sharp KA
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1156-60. PubMed ID: 26990788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward a predictive understanding of slow methyl group dynamics in proteins.
    Long D; Li DW; Walter KF; Griesinger C; Brüschweiler R
    Biophys J; 2011 Aug; 101(4):910-5. PubMed ID: 21843482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining Molecular and Spin Dynamics Simulations with Solid-State NMR: A Case Study of Amphiphilic Lysine-Leucine Repeat Peptide Aggregates.
    Emani PS; Yimer YY; Davidowski SK; Gebhart RN; Ferreira HE; Kuprov I; Pfaendtner J; Drobny GP
    J Phys Chem B; 2019 Dec; 123(51):10915-10929. PubMed ID: 31769684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    Anderson JS; Hernández G; LeMaster DM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 May; 16(5):2896-2913. PubMed ID: 32268062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly.
    Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Explicit models of motions to analyze NMR relaxation data in proteins.
    Bolik-Coulon N; Ferrage F
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Sep; 157(12):125102. PubMed ID: 36182415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.
    Lindorff-Larsen K; Piana S; Palmo K; Maragakis P; Klepeis JL; Dror RO; Shaw DE
    Proteins; 2010 Jun; 78(8):1950-8. PubMed ID: 20408171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unraveling motion in proteins by combining NMR relaxometry and molecular dynamics simulations: A case study on ubiquitin.
    Champion C; Lehner M; Smith AA; Ferrage F; Bolik-Coulon N; Riniker S
    J Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 160(10):. PubMed ID: 38465679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gramicidin A backbone and side chain dynamics evaluated by molecular dynamics simulations and nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. I: molecular dynamics simulations.
    Ingólfsson HI; Li Y; Vostrikov VV; Gu H; Hinton JF; Koeppe RE; Roux B; Andersen OS
    J Phys Chem B; 2011 Jun; 115(22):7417-26. PubMed ID: 21574563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methyl rotation barriers in proteins from 2H relaxation data. Implications for protein structure.
    Xue Y; Pavlova MS; Ryabov YE; Reif B; Skrynnikov NR
    J Am Chem Soc; 2007 May; 129(21):6827-38. PubMed ID: 17488010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.