BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32114461)

  • 1. Online patient feedback as a measure of quality in primary care: a multimethod study using correlation and qualitative analysis.
    Boylan AM; Turk A; van Velthoven MH; Powell J
    BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e031820. PubMed ID: 32114461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement: a focus group study in English general practice.
    Boiko O; Campbell JL; Elmore N; Davey AF; Roland M; Burt J
    Health Expect; 2015 Dec; 18(6):1982-94. PubMed ID: 25366992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Friends and Family Test in general practice in England: a qualitative study of the views of staff and patients.
    Manacorda T; Erens B; Black N; Mays N
    Br J Gen Pract; 2017 May; 67(658):e370-e376. PubMed ID: 28450345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of patient experience survey data by out-of-hours primary care services: a qualitative interview study.
    Barry HE; Campbell JL; Asprey A; Richards SH
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Nov; 25(11):851-859. PubMed ID: 26490004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What does patient feedback reveal about the NHS? A mixed methods study of comments posted to the NHS Choices online service.
    Brookes G; Baker P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Apr; 7(4):e013821. PubMed ID: 28450463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mixed-methods analysis of patient reviews of hospital care in England: implications for public reporting of health care quality data in the United States.
    Lagu T; Goff SL; Hannon NS; Shatz A; Lindenauer PK
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2013 Jan; 39(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23367647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges to the credibility of patient feedback in primary healthcare settings: a qualitative study.
    Asprey A; Campbell JL; Newbould J; Cohn S; Carter M; Davey A; Roland M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Mar; 63(608):e200-8. PubMed ID: 23561787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. General Practitioners' Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England.
    Patel S; Cain R; Neailey K; Hooberman L
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e276. PubMed ID: 26681299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enabling Young Service Users to Provide Feedback on their Experience: An Evaluation of the Pilot Implementation of Children and Young People Accessible Friends and Family Test in General and Dental Practices in NHS England South (South Central).
    Medforth N; Rooksby K
    Compr Child Adolesc Nurs; 2018 Mar; 41(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 29474801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England.
    Patel S; Cain R; Neailey K; Hooberman L
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jul; 20(7):e243. PubMed ID: 30045831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Dermatology Practice Online Reviews: Lessons From Qualitative Analysis.
    Smith RJ; Lipoff JB
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Feb; 152(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 26606326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How can patient experience scores be used to predict quality inspection ratings? A retrospective cross-sectional study of national primary care datasets in the UK.
    Tallett A; Poots AJ; Graham C; Peters M; Corbett R; Sizmur S; Forder J
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e041709. PubMed ID: 33243813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care.
    Carter M; Davey A; Wright C; Elmore N; Newbould J; Roland M; Campbell J; Burt J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Nov; 66(652):e786-e793. PubMed ID: 27621292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol.
    Weich S; Fenton SH; Bhui K; Staniszewska S; Madan J; Larkin M; Newton E; Crepaz-Keay D; Canaway A; Croft C; Griffiths F
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e021013. PubMed ID: 29903792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementing a survey for patients to provide safety experience feedback following a care transition: a feasibility study.
    Scott J; Heavey E; Waring J; De BrĂșn A; Dawson P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Aug; 19(1):613. PubMed ID: 31470853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients' use and views of real-time feedback technology in general practice.
    Wright C; Davey A; Elmore N; Carter M; Mounce L; Wilson E; Burt J; Roland M; Campbell J
    Health Expect; 2017 Jun; 20(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 27124589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care.
    Turner A; Morris R; McDonagh L; Hamilton F; Blake S; Farr M; Stevenson F; Banks J; Atherton H; Rakhra D; Lasseter G; Feder G; Ziebland S; Hyde E; Powell J; Horwood J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2023 Jan; 73(726):e67-e74. PubMed ID: 36316163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.