These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Results of the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study 10 years after surgery. Waring GO; Lynn MJ; McDonnell PJ Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Oct; 112(10):1298-308. PubMed ID: 7945032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship of glare to uncorrected visual acuity and cycloplegic refraction 1 year after radial keratotomy in the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study. Cartwright CS; Bourque LB; Lynn M; Waring GO J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jan; 59(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 3278044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Morning-to-evening change in refraction, corneal curvature, and visual acuity 11 years after radial keratotomy in the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy study. The PERK Study Group. McDonnell PJ; Nizam A; Lynn MJ; Waring GO Ophthalmology; 1996 Feb; 103(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 8594507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal topography as a predictor of refractive change in the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study. Rowsey JJ; Waring GO; Monlux RD; Balyeat HD; Stevens SX; Culbertson W; Barron B; Nelson D; Asbell P; Smith R Ophthalmic Surg; 1991 Jul; 22(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 1891181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. Ginsburg AP; Waring GO; Steinberg EB; Williams PA; Justin N; Deitz JR; Roszka-Duggan VK; Baluvelt K; Bourque L Refract Corneal Surg; 1990; 6(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2248920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Symmetry of refractive and visual acuity outcome in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) study. Lynn MJ; Waring GO; Nizam A; Kutner MH; Culbertson W; McDonald MB; Meyers WD; Naidoff MA; Nelson JD; Obstbaum SA Refract Corneal Surg; 1989; 5(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 2488790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between refractive error and visual acuity in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. Santos VR; Waring GO; Lynn MJ; Holladay JT; Sperduto RD Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Jan; 105(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 3800751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morning-to-evening change in refraction, corneal curvature, and visual acuity 2 to 4 years after radial keratotomy in the PERK Study. Santos VR; Waring GO; Lynn MJ; Schanzlin DJ; Cantillo N; Espinal ME; Garbus J; Justin N; Roszka-Duggan V Ophthalmology; 1988 Nov; 95(11):1487-93. PubMed ID: 3211457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radial keratotomy for intolerable myopia after penetrating keratoplasty. Shapiro MB; Harrison DA Am J Ophthalmol; 1993 Mar; 115(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 8442491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A purse-string suture for penetrating keratoplasty following radial keratotomy. McNeill JI; Wilkins DL Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 1958628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectacle and contact lens wearing six years after radial keratotomy in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy Study. Bourque LB; Lynn MJ; Waring GO; Cartwright C Ophthalmology; 1994 Mar; 101(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 8127562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting outcome and predictability of radial keratotomy in the PERK Study. Lynn MJ; Waring GO; Sperduto RD Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Jan; 105(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 3800746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]