333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32115221)
1. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners.
Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems].
Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 27636766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch.
Medina-Sotomayor P; Pascual-Moscardo A; Camps A I
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 30598308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
Elter B; Tak Ö
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study.
Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 26794703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study.
Vandeweghe S; Vervack V; Dierens M; De Bruyn H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):648-653. PubMed ID: 27150731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study.
Passos L; Meiga S; Brigagão V; Street A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):307-319. PubMed ID: 31840139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of age, training, intraoral scanner, and software version on the scan accuracy of inexperienced operators.
Zarauz C; Pradíes GJ; Chebib N; Dönmez MB; Karasan D; Sailer I
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):135-141. PubMed ID: 37837217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of scan powder and scanning technology on measured deviations of complete-arch implant supported frameworks digitized with industrial and intraoral scanners.
Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Dede DÖ; Küçükekenci AS; Lu WE; Schumacher FL; Revilla-León M; Yilmaz B
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104736. PubMed ID: 37802291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
Osman RB; Alharbi NM
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
