These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32115845)
1. Combination of several matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) with an application in psoriasis. Saure D; Schacht A; Kadziola Z; Brnabic AJM Pharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 19(5):532-540. PubMed ID: 32115845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternative Weighting Approaches for Anchored Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons via a Common Comparator. Petto H; Kadziola Z; Brnabic A; Saure D; Belger M Value Health; 2019 Jan; 22(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 30661638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Adjusted and Unadjusted Indirect Comparison Methods in Benefit Assessment. A Simulation Study for Time-to-event Endpoints. Kühnast S; Schiffner-Rohe J; Rahnenführer J; Leverkus F Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):261-267. PubMed ID: 28361159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the impact of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Leahy J; Walsh C Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):546-568. PubMed ID: 31368653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data. Veroniki AA; Straus SE; Soobiah C; Elliott MJ; Tricco AC BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():47. PubMed ID: 27116943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for Indirect Treatment Comparison: Results from a Systematic Literature Review. Macabeo B; Quenéchdu A; Aballéa S; François C; Boyer L; Laramée P J Mark Access Health Policy; 2024 Jun; 12(2):58-80. PubMed ID: 38660413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research. Signorovitch JE; Sikirica V; Erder MH; Xie J; Lu M; Hodgkins PS; Betts KA; Wu EQ Value Health; 2012; 15(6):940-7. PubMed ID: 22999145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-stage matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Remiro-Azócar A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):217. PubMed ID: 35941551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) results confirmed by head-to-head trials: a case study in psoriasis. Signorovitch J; Diels J; Van Sanden S; Schubert A; Hassan F; Thilakarathne P; Ozturk B; Barthelmes N; Reich K J Dermatolog Treat; 2023 Dec; 34(1):2169574. PubMed ID: 36724798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical Appraisal of Published Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta-Analyses of Competing Interventions for Multiple Myeloma. Cope S; Toor K; Popoff E; Fonseca R; Landgren O; Mateos MV; Weisel K; Jansen JP Value Health; 2020 Apr; 23(4):441-450. PubMed ID: 32327161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive review and shiny application on the matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Jiang Z; Cappelleri JC; Gamalo M; Chen Y; Thomas N; Chu H Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jul; 15(4):671-686. PubMed ID: 38380799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of considering differences in study and patient characteristics before undertaking indirect treatment comparisons: a case study of siponimod for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Samjoo IA; Worthington E; Haltner A; Cameron C; Nicholas R; Dahlke F; Adlard N Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Jul; 36(7):1145-1156. PubMed ID: 32216597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternative weighting schemes when performing matching-adjusted indirect comparisons. Jackson D; Rhodes K; Ouwens M Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):333-346. PubMed ID: 33131206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Critical Appraisal of Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Jiang T; Youn B; Paradis AD; Beckerman R; Barnieh L; Johnson NB Adv Ther; 2023 Jul; 40(7):2985-3005. PubMed ID: 37277563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of Relative-Efficacy Estimate(S) Derived From Both Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons and Standard Anchored Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons. Cassidy O; Harte M; Trela-Larsen L; Walsh C; White A; McCullagh L; Leahy J Value Health; 2023 Nov; 26(11):1665-1674. PubMed ID: 37460009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with ixekizumab vs. secukinumab. Warren RB; Brnabic A; Saure D; Langley RG; See K; Wu JJ; Schacht A; Mallbris L; Nast A Br J Dermatol; 2018 May; 178(5):1064-1071. PubMed ID: 29171861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of siponimod and other disease modifying treatments in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Samjoo IA; Worthington E; Haltner A; Cameron C; Nicholas R; Rouyrre N; Dahlke F; Adlard N Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Jul; 36(7):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 32220214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Equivalence of entropy balancing and the method of moments for matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Phillippo DM; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):568-572. PubMed ID: 32395870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Fautrel B; Zhu B; Taylor PC; van de Laar M; Emery P; De Leonardis F; Kannowski CL; Nicolay C; Kadziola Z; De La Torre I; Fleischmann R RMD Open; 2020 Apr; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 32371431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Methods for Estimating Therapy Effects by Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation Study. Weber D; Jensen K; Kieser M Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):644-654. PubMed ID: 32659160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]