238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32115870)
1. Detectability of cerebellar activity with magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
Samuelsson JG; Sundaram P; Khan S; Sereno MI; Hämäläinen MS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jun; 41(9):2357-2372. PubMed ID: 32115870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can EEG and MEG detect signals from the human cerebellum?
Andersen LM; Jerbi K; Dalal SS
Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116817. PubMed ID: 32278092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
Srinivasan R
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biophysically detailed forward modeling of the neural origin of EEG and MEG signals.
Næss S; Halnes G; Hagen E; Hagler DJ; Dale AM; Einevoll GT; Ness TV
Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117467. PubMed ID: 33075556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources.
Ahlfors SP; Han J; Lin FH; Witzel T; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Halgren E
Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 19639553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetoencephalography for localizing and characterizing the epileptic focus.
Burgess RC
Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():203-214. PubMed ID: 31277848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic and robust noise suppression in EEG and MEG: The SOUND algorithm.
Mutanen TP; Metsomaa J; Liljander S; Ilmoniemi RJ
Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 166():135-151. PubMed ID: 29061529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses.
Babajani A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1794-801. PubMed ID: 16941835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New Cognitive Neurotechnology Facilitates Studies of Cortical-Subcortical Interactions.
Min BK; Hämäläinen MS; Pantazis D
Trends Biotechnol; 2020 Sep; 38(9):952-962. PubMed ID: 32278504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
