238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32115870)
21. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. On the EEG/MEG forward problem solution for distributed cortical sources.
von Ellenrieder N; Valdés-Hernández PA; Muravchik CH
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1083-91. PubMed ID: 19730912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interictal and ictal source localization for epilepsy surgery using high-density EEG with MEG: a prospective long-term study.
Plummer C; Vogrin SJ; Woods WP; Murphy MA; Cook MJ; Liley DTJ
Brain; 2019 Apr; 142(4):932-951. PubMed ID: 30805596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
Ding L; Yuan H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing MEG and high-density EEG for intrinsic functional connectivity mapping.
Coquelet N; De Tiège X; Destoky F; Roshchupkina L; Bourguignon M; Goldman S; Peigneux P; Wens V
Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 210():116556. PubMed ID: 31972279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Geometrical interpretation of fMRI-guided MEG/EEG inverse estimates.
Ahlfors SP; Simpson GV
Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):323-32. PubMed ID: 15110022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle.
Babiloni F; Mattia D; Babiloni C; Astolfi L; Salinari S; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Marciani MG; Cincotti F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1471-6. PubMed ID: 15707796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictive regression modeling with MEG/EEG: from source power to signals and cognitive states.
Sabbagh D; Ablin P; Varoquaux G; Gramfort A; Engemann DA
Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 222():116893. PubMed ID: 32439535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis.
Huizenga HM; van Zuijen TL; Heslenfeld DJ; Molenaar PC
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jul; 46(7):1737-51. PubMed ID: 11474922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG: A comparison of representational structure in time and space.
Cichy RM; Pantazis D
Neuroimage; 2017 Sep; 158():441-454. PubMed ID: 28716718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
Engemann DA; Gramfort A
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MEG and TMS combined with EEG for mapping alcohol effects.
Kähkönen S
Alcohol; 2005 Nov; 37(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 16713500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
