These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3211670)

  • 1. Response latency measurements to visual cognitive tasks by normal hearing and deaf subjects.
    Chovan JD; Waldron MB; Rose S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):179-84. PubMed ID: 3211670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual spatial representation in mathematical problem solving by deaf and hearing students.
    Blatto-Vallee G; Kelly RR; Gaustad MG; Porter J; Fonzi J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007; 12(4):432-48. PubMed ID: 17548803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of a group of deaf and hard-of-hearing students and a comparison group of hearing students on a series of problem-solving tasks.
    Luckner JL; McNeill JH
    Am Ann Deaf; 1994 Jul; 139(3):371-7. PubMed ID: 7992783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive consequences of congenital deafness.
    Tomlinson-Keasey C; Smith-Winberry C
    J Genet Psychol; 1990 Mar; 151(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 2332754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When parents are deaf versus hard of hearing: patterns of sign use and school placement of deaf and hard-of-hearing children.
    Mitchell RE; Karchmer MA
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2004; 9(2):133-52. PubMed ID: 15304437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-verbal IQ is correlated with visual field advantages for short duration coherent motion detection in deaf signers with varied ASL exposure and etiologies of deafness.
    Samar VJ; Parasnis I
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Dec; 65(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 17574715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive behaviour modification: a technique for teaching subtraction skills to hearing and deaf/hard-of-hearing elementary students.
    Al-Hilawani YA
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2000 Sep; 23(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 11131624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual matching test-taking strategies used by deaf readers.
    LaSasso C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 3981994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hearing subjects.
    Reynolds HN
    Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(4):523-40. PubMed ID: 8296925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring creativity through computer graphics of hearing-impaired children.
    Rose S; Waldron M; Kolomyjec W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Dec; 57(3 Pt 1):943-50. PubMed ID: 6689365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deaf students and their classroom communication: an evaluation of higher order categorical interactions among school and background characteristics.
    Allen TE; Anderson ML
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2010; 15(4):334-47. PubMed ID: 20624758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of signability and imagery on word recall of deaf and hearing students.
    Bonvillian JD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Jun; 56(3):775-91. PubMed ID: 6877965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual evoked potentials and event related potentials in congenitally deaf subjects.
    Chlubnová J; Kremlácek J; Kubová Z; Kuba M
    Physiol Res; 2005; 54(6):577-83. PubMed ID: 15717858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual attention in deaf and hearing infants: the role of auditory cues.
    Harris M; Chasin J
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1116-23. PubMed ID: 16178936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognition and functional outcome among deaf and hearing people with schizophrenia.
    Horton HK; Silverstein SM
    Schizophr Res; 2007 Aug; 94(1-3):187-96. PubMed ID: 17560083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive functioning of the prelingually deaf adults.
    Pokorski M; Klimańska S
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2015; 837():41-7. PubMed ID: 25310953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response bias in deaf and hearing subjects as a function of motivational factors.
    Bross M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Dec; 49(3):779-82. PubMed ID: 530780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technology skills assessment for deaf and hard of hearing students in secondary school.
    Luft P; Bonello M; Zirzow NK
    Am Ann Deaf; 2009; 154(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 20066921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting acceptance and popularity in early adolescence as a function of hearing status, gender, and educational setting.
    Wolters N; Knoors HE; Cillessen AH; Verhoeven L
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(6):2553-65. PubMed ID: 21840686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.