156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32118100)
1. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle biopsy versus single-incision with needle knife for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a randomized controlled trial.
Sanaei O; Fernández-Esparrach G; De La Serna-Higuera C; Carrara S; Kumbhari V; El Zein MH; Ismail A; Ginès A; Sendino O; Montenegro A; Repici A; Rahal D; Brewer Gutierrez OI; Moran R; Yang J; Parsa N; Paiji C; Aghaie Meybodi M; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Kalloo AN; Singh VK; Canto MI; Khashab MA
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Mar; 8(3):E266-E273. PubMed ID: 32118100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. EUS-guided single-incision needle-knife biopsy: description and results of a new method for tissue sampling of subepithelial GI tumors (with video).
de la Serna-Higuera C; Pérez-Miranda M; Díez-Redondo P; Gil-Simón P; Herranz T; Pérez-Martín E; Ochoa C; Caro-Patón A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Sep; 74(3):672-6. PubMed ID: 21872716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility and Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy With a New Core Biopsy Needle Device in Patients With Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.
Lee M; Min BH; Lee H; Ahn S; Lee JH; Rhee PL; Kim JJ; Sohn TS; Kim S; Kim KM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct; 94(40):e1622. PubMed ID: 26448008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Marschall HU; Nilsson B; Demir A; Lindkvist B; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1304-1313. PubMed ID: 28812151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling of small subepithelial tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract with a 22-gauge core biopsy needle.
Schlag C; Menzel C; Götzberger M; Nennstiel S; Klare P; Wagenpfeil S; Schmid RM; Weirich G; von Delius S
Endosc Int Open; 2017 Mar; 5(3):E165-E171. PubMed ID: 28299351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endosonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration versus "Key-Hole Biopsy" in the diagnostics of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors. A prospective randomized interventional study.
Zoundjiekpon V; Falt P; Fojtik P; Kundratova E; Mikolajek O; Hanousek M; Reiterova K; Ziak D; Bolek M; Tchibozo A; Kliment M; Urban O
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2020 Mar; 164(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 31025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy in upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors measuring 2-5 cm in size.
Joo DC; Kim GH; Lee MW; Lee BE; Baek DH; Song GA
Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8060-8066. PubMed ID: 35441867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Retrospective Analysis.
Kuraoka N; Hashimoto S; Matsui S; Terai S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34071881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-incision needle-knife biopsy for the diagnosis of GI subepithelial tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Naga YSE; Dhindsa BS; Deliwala S; Tun KM; Dhaliwal A; Ramai D; Bhat I; Singh S; Chandan S; Adler DG
Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Apr; 97(4):640-645.e2. PubMed ID: 36460089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.
Han JP; Lee TH; Hong SJ; Kim HK; Noh HM; Lee YN; Choi HJ
J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
