BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32118697)

  • 1. Association Between Radiographic Spinopelvic Parameters and Health-related Quality of Life in De Novo Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Concomitant Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Gao A; Wang Y; Yu M; Wei F; Jiang L; Liu Z; Liu X
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Aug; 45(16):E1013-E1019. PubMed ID: 32118697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sagittal radiographic parameters demonstrate weak correlations with pretreatment patient-reported health-related quality of life measures in symptomatic de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a European multicenter analysis.
    Faraj SSA; De Kleuver M; Vila-Casademunt A; Holewijn RM; Obeid I; Acaroğlu E; Alanay A; Kleinstück F; Pérez-Grueso FS; Pellisé F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jun; 28(6):573-580. PubMed ID: 29570046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.
    Protopsaltis TS; Scheer JK; Terran JS; Smith JS; Hamilton DK; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Hart RA; McCarthy IM; Klineberg E; Lafage V; Bess S; Schwab F; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 25978077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between sagittal radiographic parameters and disability in patients with spinal disease using 3D standing analysis.
    Yoshihara H; Hasegawa K; Okamoto M; Hatsushikano S; Watanabe K
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 104(7):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 30103030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.
    Fakurnejad S; Scheer JK; Lafage V; Smith JS; Deviren V; Hostin R; Mundis GM; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Gupta M; Kebaish K; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 26091440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Lumbar Pelvic Angle, the Lumbar Component of the T1 Pelvic Angle, Correlates With HRQOL, PI-LL Mismatch, and it Predicts Global Alignment.
    Protopsaltis TS; Lafage R; Smith JS; Passias PG; Shaffrey CI; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Ames CP; Burton DC; Bess S; Klineberg E; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Lafage V;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 May; 43(10):681-687. PubMed ID: 28742755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When is compensation for lumbar spinal stenosis a clinical sagittal plane deformity?
    Buckland AJ; Vira S; Oren JH; Lafage R; Harris BY; Spiegel MA; Diebo BG; Liabaud B; Protopsaltis TS; Schwab FJ; Lafage V; Errico TJ; Bendo JA
    Spine J; 2016 Aug; 16(8):971-81. PubMed ID: 27063925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of postoperative sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on the outcome of patients surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Radovanovic I; Urquhart JC; Ganapathy V; Siddiqi F; Gurr KR; Bailey SI; Bailey CS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):448-453. PubMed ID: 28106523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Relevance of the SRS-Schwab Classification for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.
    Ha KY; Jang WH; Kim YH; Park DC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Mar; 41(5):E282-8. PubMed ID: 26571177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnitude of preoperative cervical lordotic compensation and C2-T3 angle are correlated to increased risk of postoperative sagittal spinal pelvic malalignment in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.
    Passias PG; Soroceanu A; Scheer J; Yang S; Boniello A; Smith JS; Protopsaltis T; Kim HJ; Schwab F; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Mundis G; Lafage R; Hart R; Shaffrey C; Lafage V; Ames C;
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1756-63. PubMed ID: 25862507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis.
    Schwab FJ; Blondel B; Bess S; Hostin R; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS; Boachie-Adjei O; Burton DC; Akbarnia BA; Mundis GM; Ames CP; Kebaish K; Hart RA; Farcy JP; Lafage V;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E803-12. PubMed ID: 23722572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients.
    Scheer JK; Passias PG; Sorocean AM; Boniello AJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Kim HJ; Protopsaltis TS; Gupta M; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Lafage V; Smith JS; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 26360147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between clinical outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in osteoporosis.
    Lee JS; Shin JK; An SJ; Suh KT; Kang SS
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Dec; 80(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 26280725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of Sagittal Spinopelvic Realignment with Correction in Lower Lumbar Lordosis after Surgical Treatment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.
    Zhang ZF; Qi DB; Wang TH; Wang CG; Wang Z; Wang Y; Zheng GQ
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2034-2042. PubMed ID: 34559468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does sagittal imbalance impact the surgical outcomes of short-segment fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?
    Hori Y; Matsumura A; Namikawa T; Kato M; Takahashi S; Ohyama S; Ozaki T; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    J Orthop Sci; 2019 Mar; 24(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 30391135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.