505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32119094)
21. Range of Radiologist Performance in a Population-based Screening Cohort of 1 Million Digital Mammography Examinations.
Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Lindholm P; Strand F
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 32720866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Pinto MC; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Pedersen K; Hofvind S; Wicklein J; Kappler S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):529-536. PubMed ID: 34227882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Semiautonomous Deep Learning System to Reduce False Positives in Screening Mammography.
Pedemonte S; Tsue T; Mombourquette B; Truong Vu YN; Matthews T; Morales Hoil R; Shah M; Ghare N; Zingman-Daniels N; Holley S; Appleton CM; Su J; Wahl RL
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230033. PubMed ID: 38597785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiologist Preferences for Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support During Screening Mammography Interpretation.
Hendrix N; Lowry KP; Elmore JG; Lotter W; Sorensen G; Hsu W; Liao GJ; Parsian S; Kolb S; Naeim A; Lee CI
J Am Coll Radiol; 2022 Oct; 19(10):1098-1110. PubMed ID: 35970474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.
Torres-Mejía G; Smith RA; Carranza-Flores Mde L; Bogart A; Martínez-Matsushita L; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Ortega-Olvera C; Montemayor-Varela E; Angeles-Llerenas A; Bautista-Arredondo S; Sánchez-González G; Martínez-Montañez OG; Uscanga-Sánchez SR; Lazcano-Ponce E; Hernández-Ávila M
BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():410. PubMed ID: 25975383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.
Elmore JG; Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Buist DS
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 19864507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy.
Freeman K; Geppert J; Stinton C; Todkill D; Johnson S; Clarke A; Taylor-Phillips S
BMJ; 2021 Sep; 374():n1872. PubMed ID: 34470740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation study.
Dembrower K; Wåhlin E; Liu Y; Salim M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Eklund M; Strand F
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Sep; 2(9):e468-e474. PubMed ID: 33328114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Combining the strengths of radiologists and AI for breast cancer screening: a retrospective analysis.
Leibig C; Brehmer M; Bunk S; Byng D; Pinker K; Umutlu L
Lancet Digit Health; 2022 Jul; 4(7):e507-e519. PubMed ID: 35750400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differences and similarities in false interpretations by AI CAD and radiologists in screening mammography.
Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Smith K; Strand F
Br J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 96(1151):20230210. PubMed ID: 37660400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.
Larsen M; Olstad CF; Lee CI; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Martiniussen MA; Mikalsen KØ; Lund-Hanssen H; Solli HS; Silberhorn M; Sulheim ÅØ; Auensen S; Nygård JF; Hofvind S
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230375. PubMed ID: 38597784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists.
Kim JG; Haslam B; Diab AR; Sakhare A; Grisot G; Lee H; Holt J; Lee CI; Lotter W; Sorensen AG
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230137. PubMed ID: 38323914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Independent External Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Automated Interpretation of Screening Mammography: A Systematic Review.
Anderson AW; Marinovich ML; Houssami N; Lowry KP; Elmore JG; Buist DSM; Hofvind S; Lee CI
J Am Coll Radiol; 2022 Feb; 19(2 Pt A):259-273. PubMed ID: 35065909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Deep learning performance for detection and classification of microcalcifications on mammography.
Pesapane F; Trentin C; Ferrari F; Signorelli G; Tantrige P; Montesano M; Cicala C; Virgoli R; D'Acquisto S; Nicosia L; Origgi D; Cassano E
Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Nov; 7(1):69. PubMed ID: 37934382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Protocol for evaluating the fitness for purpose of an artificial intelligence product for radiology reporting in the BreastScreen New South Wales breast cancer screening programme.
Warner-Smith M; Ren K; Mistry C; Walton R; Roder D; Bhola N; McGill S; O'Brien TA
BMJ Open; 2024 May; 14(5):e082350. PubMed ID: 38806433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Deep Learning Model to Triage Screening Mammograms: A Simulation Study.
Yala A; Schuster T; Miles R; Barzilay R; Lehman C
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 31385754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stand-alone artificial intelligence - The future of breast cancer screening?
Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():254-260. PubMed ID: 31927164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Bailey JE; Nees AV; Blane CE; Adler DD; Patterson SK; Klein KA; Pinsky RW; Helvie MA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):810-8. PubMed ID: 19375953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. AI for interpreting screening mammograms: implications for missed cancer in double reading practices and challenging-to-locate lesions.
Jiang Z; Gandomkar Z; Trieu PDY; Taba ST; Barron ML; Lewis SJ
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11893. PubMed ID: 38789575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Teuwen J; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4825-4832. PubMed ID: 30993432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
