901 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3212105)
1. The indivisibility of Freudian object relations and drive theories.
Spruiell V
Psychoanal Q; 1988 Oct; 57(4):597-625. PubMed ID: 3212105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The limitations of the object relations model.
Lussier A
Psychoanal Q; 1988 Oct; 57(4):528-46. PubMed ID: 3212102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical popularity of object relations concepts.
Friedman L
Psychoanal Q; 1988 Oct; 57(4):667-91. PubMed ID: 3212108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Object relations in clinical practice.
Joseph B
Psychoanal Q; 1988 Oct; 57(4):626-42. PubMed ID: 3212106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The technical significance and application of Mahler's separation-individuation theory.
Kramer S
J Am Psychoanal Assoc; 1979; 27 Suppl():241-62. PubMed ID: 263967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The developmental context of internalized preoedipal object relations. Clinical applications of Mahler's theory of symbiosis and separation-individuation.
Kramer S; Akhtar S
Psychoanal Q; 1988 Oct; 57(4):547-76. PubMed ID: 3212103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychic change & the analyst as biographer: transference and reconstruction.
Frank A
Int J Psychoanal; 1991; 72 ( Pt 1)():22-6. PubMed ID: 2050486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Some implications of object relations theory for psychoanalytic technique.
Kernberg OF
J Am Psychoanal Assoc; 1979; 27 Suppl():207-39. PubMed ID: 263966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The question of drive vs. motive in psychoanalysis: a modest proposal.
Meissner WW
J Am Psychoanal Assoc; 2009 Aug; 57(4):807-45. PubMed ID: 19628732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The Schultz-Hencke psychology of neuroses and psychoanalytic theory today].
Naatz T
Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal; 1993; 39(2):118-33. PubMed ID: 8322529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The psychoanalytic treatment of two maternally over-protected young men.
Foulks EF
Int J Psychoanal; 1991; 72 ( Pt 3)():427-32. PubMed ID: 1938116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The centrality of the psychoanalytic setting and the changing aims of treatment. A perspective from a theory of object relations.
Modell AH
Psychoanal Q; 1988 Oct; 57(4):577-96. PubMed ID: 3212104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The two classes of objects and the two classes of transference.
Parkin A
Int J Psychoanal; 1987; 68 ( Pt 2)():185-95. PubMed ID: 3583565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice.
Sandler J
Int J Psychoanal; 1983; 64 Pt 1():35-45. PubMed ID: 6853046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reconsideration of the concept of transference neurosis.
Reed GS
Int J Psychoanal; 1990; 71 ( Pt 2)():205-17. PubMed ID: 2365543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Object relations theory in clinical practice.
Kernberg OF
Psychoanal Q; 1988 Oct; 57(4):481-504. PubMed ID: 3212099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of interpretation in psychoanalytic treatment in the light of an integrated model of internal objects.
Ilan E
Int J Psychoanal; 1977; 58(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 873691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The threshold of the male Oedipus complex.
Ogden TH
Bull Menninger Clin; 1989 Sep; 53(5):394-413. PubMed ID: 2790350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transference: terminable, interminable.
Roustang F
Psychoanal Rev; 1989; 76(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 2503842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Transference: one concept or many?
Ehrenreich JH
Psychoanal Rev; 1989; 76(1):37-65. PubMed ID: 2499900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
