These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
12. Hemispheric asymmetries in a letter classification task with different typefaces. Umiltà C; Sava D; Salmaso D Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 7363062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Monocular pattern alternation: effects of mean luminance and contrast. Kitterle FL; Kaye RS Percept Psychophys; 1984 Oct; 36(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 6522235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impaired grating discrimination following right hemisphere damage. Grabowska A; Semenza C; Denes G; Testa S Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 2927636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induced coding strategies and hemispheric differences in matching letter pairs. Edwards J; Venables PH Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(6):669-74. PubMed ID: 7162589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of set size on hemifield asymmetries in letter recognition. Miller LK; Butler D Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 7363074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Hemispheric specialization during differentiation of visual stimuli by rats]. Bianki VL; Udalova GP; Mikheev VV Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1981; 31(1):180-2. PubMed ID: 7245905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: new data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Van Kleeck MH Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(9):1165-78. PubMed ID: 2812299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition. Hatta T Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]