These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32122312)

  • 21. Sensitivity analysis for non-monotone missing binary data in longitudinal studies: Application to the NIDA collaborative cocaine treatment study.
    Fitzmaurice GM; Lipsitz SR; Weiss RD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3057-3073. PubMed ID: 30146938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of missing data due to drop-outs on estimators for rates of change in longitudinal studies: a simulation study.
    Touloumi G; Babiker AG; Pocock SJ; Darbyshire JH
    Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(24):3715-28. PubMed ID: 11782028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An evaluation of methods for the stratified analysis of clustered binary data in community intervention trials.
    Song JX; Ahn CW
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2205-16. PubMed ID: 12820284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Bayesian framework to account for uncertainty due to missing binary outcome data in pairwise meta-analysis.
    Turner NL; Dias S; Ades AE; Welton NJ
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(12):2062-80. PubMed ID: 25809313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Missing Data in Alcohol Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes.
    Hallgren KA; Witkiewitz K; Kranzler HR; Falk DE; Litten RZ; O'Malley SS; Anton RF;
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1548-57. PubMed ID: 27254113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.
    Groenwold RH; Donders AR; Roes KC; Harrell FE; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22262640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Generalized quasi-linear mixed-effects model.
    Saigusa Y; Eguchi S; Komori O
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1280-1291. PubMed ID: 35286226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consequences of handling missing data for treatment response in osteoarthritis: a simulation study.
    Olsen IC; Kvien TK; Uhlig T
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2012 Aug; 20(8):822-8. PubMed ID: 22441031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials?
    Sullivan TR; White IR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2610-2626. PubMed ID: 28034175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
    Floden L; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When a joint model should be preferred over a linear mixed model for analysis of longitudinal health-related quality of life data in cancer clinical trials.
    Touraine C; Cuer B; Conroy T; Juzyna B; Gourgou S; Mollevi C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):36. PubMed ID: 36765307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
    Hossain A; Diaz-Ordaz K; Bartlett JW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1543-1562. PubMed ID: 27177885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
    Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Treatment effects in randomized longitudinal trials with different types of nonignorable dropout.
    Yang M; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Jun; 19(2):188-210. PubMed ID: 24079928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the analysis of composite measures of quality in medical research.
    Moineddin R; Meaney C; Grunfeld E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):633-660. PubMed ID: 25296866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What are the appropriate methods for analyzing patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials when data are missing?
    Hamel JF; Sebille V; Le Neel T; Kubis G; Boyer FC; Hardouin JB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2897-2908. PubMed ID: 26546257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of single-case experimental count data using the linear mixed effects model: A simulation study.
    Declercq L; Jamshidi L; Fernández-Castilla B; Beretvas SN; Moeyaert M; Ferron JM; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2477-2497. PubMed ID: 30105444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
    Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.