These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32122782)
1. Structural validity of the Finnish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) using the Rasch model. Ponkilainen VT; Miettinen M; Sandelin H; Lindahl J; Häkkinen AH; Toom A; Tillgren T; Ilves O; Latvala AO; Ahonen K; Sirola T; Sampo M; Väistö O; Repo JP Foot Ankle Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 32122782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) into Persian language. Mousavian A; Ebrahimzadeh MH; Birjandinejad A; Omidi-Kashani F; Kachooei AR Foot (Edinb); 2015 Dec; 25(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 26365951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and psychometric performance of the French language version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Vieira Cardoso D; Dubois-Ferrière V; Hannouche D; Lübbeke A; Perneger T Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Dec; 26(8):902-906. PubMed ID: 31882344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese version (MOXFQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation. Ruiz-Muñoz M; González-Sánchez M; Li GZ; Cuesta-Vargas AI Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 43(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 31116950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Ringendahl H; Bouillon B; Eysel P; König D Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Dec; 24(6):481-485. PubMed ID: 29409194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structural validity of the foot and ankle outcome score for orthopaedic pathologies with Rasch Measurement Theory. Tapaninaho K; Saarinen AJ; Ilves O; Uimonen MM; Häkkinen AH; Sandelin H; Repo JP Foot Ankle Surg; 2022 Feb; 28(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 33757731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rasch analysis of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale for foot and ankle patients. Repo JP; Tukiainen EJ; Roine RP; Sampo M; Sandelin H; Häkkinen AH Disabil Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 41(24):2965-2971. PubMed ID: 29987946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Lüring C; König D; Bouillon B Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jun; 25(3):361-365. PubMed ID: 30321978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structural validation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire for use in foot and ankle surgery. Goodall R; Borsky K; Harrison CJ; Welck M; Malhotra K; Rodrigues JN Bone Joint J; 2024 Mar; 106-B(3):256-261. PubMed ID: 38423071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Garcés JB; Winson I; Goldhahn S; Castro MD; Swords MP; Grujic L; Rammelt S; Sands AK Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 26869503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire. Moreira TS; Magalhães Lde C; Silva RD; Martin RL; Resende MA Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 38(25):2479-90. PubMed ID: 26878102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C Foot (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 21(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 21602039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dutch Translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire: Reassessment of Reliability and Validity. Venkatesan S; Schotanus MG; Hendrickx RP J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(6):1199-1201. PubMed ID: 27623564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Italian translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity. Marinozzi A; Martinelli N; Panascì M; Cancilleri F; Franceschetti E; Vincenzi B; Di Martino A; Denaro V Qual Life Res; 2009 Sep; 18(7):923-7. PubMed ID: 19588271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Korean Version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire in Patients With Hallux Valgus. Park MJ; Ko YC; Huh JW; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):252-254. PubMed ID: 28231961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the content validity of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire in surgically treated ankle fracture patients: a qualitative study. Nguyen MQ; Broström A; Iversen MM; Harboe K; Paulsen A J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):941. PubMed ID: 38066592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire for hallux valgus deformity evaluation. Talu B; Bayramlar K; Bek N; Yakut Y Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016; 50(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 26969957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score. Morley D; Jenkinson C; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Dawson J Bone Joint Res; 2013; 2(4):66-9. PubMed ID: 23673374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of 3 Patient-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Measures. Venkatesan M; Aziz S; Mahadevan D; Korim T; Dias J; Bhatia M J Foot Ankle Surg; 2020; 59(3):507-512. PubMed ID: 32354509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally important change was estimated for the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire after foot/ankle surgery. Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 24709030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]