These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence. Guyatt GH; Ebrahim S; Alonso-Coello P; Johnston BC; Mathioudakis AG; Briel M; Mustafa RA; Sun X; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Neumann I; Kahale LA; Iorio A; Meerpohl J; Schünemann HJ; Akl EA J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():14-22. PubMed ID: 28529188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey. Akl EA; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Johnston BC; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramírez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabria AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Vernooij RW; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e009368. PubMed ID: 26423858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study. Kahale LA; Khamis AM; Diab B; Chang Y; Lopes LC; Agarwal A; Li L; Mustafa RA; Koujanian S; Waziry R; Busse JW; Dakik A; Schünemann HJ; Hooft L; Scholten RJ; Guyatt GH; Akl EA BMJ; 2020 Aug; 370():m2898. PubMed ID: 32847800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GRADE Guidelines: 29. Rating the certainty in time-to-event outcomes-Study limitations due to censoring of participants with missing data in intervention studies. Goldkuhle M; Bender R; Akl EA; van Dalen EC; Nevitt S; Mustafa RA; Guyatt GH; Trivella M; Djulbegovic B; Schünemann H; Cinquini M; Kreuzberger N; Skoetz N; J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():126-137. PubMed ID: 33007458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches. Akl EA; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt G Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 4():98. PubMed ID: 26202162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers. Ebrahim S; Akl EA; Mustafa RA; Sun X; Walter SD; Heels-Ansdell D; Alonso-Coello P; Johnston BC; Guyatt GH J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1014-1021.e1. PubMed ID: 23774111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey. Kahale LA; Diab B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Agarwal A; Mustafa RA; Kwong J; Neumann I; Li L; Lopes LC; Briel M; Busse JW; Iorio A; Vandvik PO; Alexander PE; Guyatt G; Akl EA J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():14-23. PubMed ID: 29505859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor. Spineli LM; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Schünemann HJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 30355280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children. Goldenberg JZ; Ma SS; Saxton JD; Martzen MR; Vandvik PO; Thorlund K; Guyatt GH; Johnston BC Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 May; (5):CD006095. PubMed ID: 23728658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups. Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide. Akl EA; Shawwa K; Kahale LA; Agoritsas T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Ebrahim S; Johnston BC; Neumann I; Sola I; Sun X; Vandvik P; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008431. PubMed ID: 26719310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic survey on reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials. Zhang Y; Flórez ID; Colunga Lozano LE; Aloweni FAB; Kennedy SA; Li A; Craigie S; Zhang S; Agarwal A; Lopes LC; Devji T; Wiercioch W; Riva JJ; Wang M; Jin X; Fei Y; Alexander P; Morgano GP; Zhang Y; Carrasco-Labra A; Kahale LA; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ; Thabane L; Guyatt GH J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():57-66. PubMed ID: 28583378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence]. Morche J; Freitag S; Hoffmann F; Rissling O; Langer G; Nußbaumer-Streit B; Toews I; Gartlehner G; Meerpohl JJ Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2020 Apr; 150-152():124-133. PubMed ID: 31980320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A guidance was developed to identify participants with missing outcome data in randomized controlled trials. Kahale LA; Guyatt GH; Agoritsas T; Briel M; Busse JW; Carrasco-Labra A; Khamis AM; Zhang Y; Hooft L; Scholten RJPM; Akl EA J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():55-63. PubMed ID: 31299357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences: Risk of bias and indirectness]. Kaiser L; Hübscher M; Rissling O; Schulz S; Langer G; Meerpohl J; Schwingshackl L Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2021 Feb; 160():78-88. PubMed ID: 33461905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks. Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Zuk V; Vandvik PO; Alba AC; Mustafa R; Vernooij R; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Munn Z; Roshanov P; Riley R; Schandelmaier S; Kuijpers T; Siemieniuk R; Canelo-Aybar C; Schunemann H; Iorio A J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():62-70. PubMed ID: 31982539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis. Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]