BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32122914)

  • 1. Posterior corneal features in patients with Down syndrome and their relation with keratoconus.
    Vega-Estrada A; Fariselli C; Alio JL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 104(12):1683-1689. PubMed ID: 32122914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal Morphologic Characteristics in Patients With Down Syndrome.
    Alio JL; Vega-Estrada A; Sanz P; Osman AA; Kamal AM; Mamoon A; Soliman H
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 136(9):971-978. PubMed ID: 29931124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
    Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive Analysis Between Topographic, Pachymetric and Wavefront Parameters in Keratoconus, Suspects and Normal Eyes: Creating Unified Equations to Evaluate Keratoconus.
    Prakash G; Suhail M; Srivastava D
    Curr Eye Res; 2016; 41(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25803133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Keratoconus in Down syndrome: Prevalence, risk factors, severity and corneal tomographic characteristics.
    Mathan JJ; Gokul A; Simkin SK; Meyer JJ; McGhee CNJ
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024; 52(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 37963802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of corneal topography, pachymetry and higher order aberrations for detecting subclinical keratoconus.
    Kandel S; Chaudhary M; Mishra SK; Joshi ND; Subedi M; Puri PR; Gyawali P; Bist J; Kandel H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 May; 42(3):594-608. PubMed ID: 35147226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Keratoconus Corneal Posterior Surface Characterization According to the Degree of Visual Limitation.
    Vega-Estrada A; Alio JL
    Cornea; 2019 Jun; 38(6):730-736. PubMed ID: 30865046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
    Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aberrations and topography in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and keratoconic eyes.
    Gordon-Shaag A; Millodot M; Ifrah R; Shneor E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 89(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 22311193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of corneal volume from anterior topography and topographic pachymetry: application to healthy and keratoconic eyes.
    Cerviño A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Ferrer-Blasco T; Garcia-Resua C; Montes-Mico R; Parafita M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):652-60. PubMed ID: 19821928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
    Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-Dimensional Morphogeometric and Volumetric Characterization of Cornea in Pediatric Patients With Early Keratoconus.
    Toprak I; Cavas F; Velázquez JS; Alió Del Barrio JL; Alió JL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 222():102-111. PubMed ID: 32971022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel zernike application to differentiate between three-dimensional corneal thickness of normal corneas and corneas with keratoconus.
    Shetty R; Matalia H; Srivatsa P; Ghosh A; Dupps WJ; Sinha Roy A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 160(3):453-462.e2. PubMed ID: 26067190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of classifying keratoconus location based on keratometry or pachymetry on progression parameters.
    Bardan AS; Kubrak-Kisza M; Kisza KJ; Nanavaty MA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 May; 103(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 31184397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiating Keratoconus and Corneal Warpage by Analyzing Focal Change Patterns in Corneal Topography, Pachymetry, and Epithelial Thickness Maps.
    Tang M; Li Y; Chamberlain W; Louie DJ; Schallhorn JM; Huang D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 57(9):OCT544-9. PubMed ID: 27482824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brillouin Spectroscopy of Normal and Keratoconus Corneas.
    Seiler TG; Shao P; Eltony A; Seiler T; Yun SH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 202():118-125. PubMed ID: 30772345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
    Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early, Forme Fruste keratoconus and normal thin cornea, evaluation of sensitive parameters by combined Placido Scheimpflug topography.
    Gharieb HM; Abdelatif MK; Gharieb HM; Othman IS
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 37731321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Corneal Pachymetry Distribution and Morphologic Changes in Subclinical Keratoconus with Normal Biomechanics.
    Song P; Yang K; Li P; Liu Y; Liang D; Ren S; Zeng Q
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():1748579. PubMed ID: 31828090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in central and non-central keratoconus, and their effect on the objective screening thresholds for keratoconus.
    Prakash G; Srivastava D; Choudhuri S; Thirumalai SM; Bacero R
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 94(2):e118-29. PubMed ID: 26523841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.