These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32122961)

  • 1. Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in
    Chandler CH; Mammel A; Dworkin I
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 May; 10(5):1541-1551. PubMed ID: 32122961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual selection and the evolution of secondary sexual traits: sex comb evolution in Drosophila.
    Snook RR; Gidaszewski NA; Chapman T; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):912-8. PubMed ID: 23496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.
    Colpitts J; Williscroft D; Sekhon HS; Rundle HD
    Biol Lett; 2017 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 29021319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection and the nonrandom union of gametes: retesting for assortative mating by fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Talagala S; Rakosy E; Long TAF
    Evolution; 2024 Jan; 78(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 37875133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.
    Hollis B; Houle D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1918-26. PubMed ID: 21658188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variation and evolution of male sex combs in Drosophila: nature of selection response and theories of genetic variation for sexual traits.
    Ahuja A; Singh RS
    Genetics; 2008 May; 179(1):503-9. PubMed ID: 18493067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hollis B; Fierst JL; Houle D
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19154371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental complexity and the purging of deleterious alleles.
    Singh A; Agrawal AF; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2017 Nov; 71(11):2714-2720. PubMed ID: 28840604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2008 Apr; 62(4):857-67. PubMed ID: 18221380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Clark SC; Sharp NP; Rowe L; Agrawal AF
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37351. PubMed ID: 22662148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual selection against deleterious mutations via variable male search success.
    Maclellan K; Whitlock MC; Rundle HD
    Biol Lett; 2009 Dec; 5(6):795-7. PubMed ID: 19625301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in gene expression in response to a manipulation of mate competition.
    Mishra P; Rundle HD; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2024 Mar; 78(4):746-757. PubMed ID: 38270064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment.
    Holland B
    Evolution; 2002 Apr; 56(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 12038530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2013 Apr; 67(4):1189-95. PubMed ID: 23550766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constrained evolution of the sex comb in Drosophila simulans.
    Maraqa MS; Griffin R; Sharma MD; Wilson AJ; Hunt J; Hosken DJ; House CM
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Feb; 30(2):388-400. PubMed ID: 27859860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of Drosophila sex comb length illustrates the inextricable interplay between selection and variation.
    Malagón JN; Ahuja A; Sivapatham G; Hung J; Lee J; Muñoz-Gómez SA; Atallah J; Singh RS; Larsen E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111(39):E4103-9. PubMed ID: 25197080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial heterogeneity in resources alters selective dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wilson AE; Siddiqui A; Dworkin I
    Evolution; 2021 Jul; 75(7):1792-1804. PubMed ID: 33963761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for local adaptation in adult male and female fitness among populations evolved under different mate competition regimes.
    Yun L; Bayoumi M; Yang S; Chen PJ; Rundle HD; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2019 Aug; 73(8):1604-1616. PubMed ID: 31206649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.