246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32123342)
1. Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election.
Guess AM; Nyhan B; Reifler J
Nat Hum Behav; 2020 May; 4(5):472-480. PubMed ID: 32123342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2020 US election.
Moore RC; Dahlke R; Hancock JT
Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jul; 7(7):1096-1105. PubMed ID: 37055575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomy of an online misinformation network.
Shao C; Hui PM; Wang L; Jiang X; Flammini A; Menczer F; Ciampaglia GL
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196087. PubMed ID: 29702657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook.
González-Bailón S; Lazer D; Barberá P; Zhang M; Allcott H; Brown T; Crespo-Tenorio A; Freelon D; Gentzkow M; Guess AM; Iyengar S; Kim YM; Malhotra N; Moehler D; Nyhan B; Pan J; Rivera CV; Settle J; Thorson E; Tromble R; Wilkins A; Wojcieszak M; de Jonge CK; Franco A; Mason W; Stroud NJ; Tucker JA
Science; 2023 Jul; 381(6656):392-398. PubMed ID: 37499003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing.
Nyhan B; Settle J; Thorson E; Wojcieszak M; Barberá P; Chen AY; Allcott H; Brown T; Crespo-Tenorio A; Dimmery D; Freelon D; Gentzkow M; González-Bailón S; Guess AM; Kennedy E; Kim YM; Lazer D; Malhotra N; Moehler D; Pan J; Thomas DR; Tromble R; Rivera CV; Wilkins A; Xiong B; de Jonge CK; Franco A; Mason W; Stroud NJ; Tucker JA
Nature; 2023 Aug; 620(7972):137-144. PubMed ID: 37500978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections.
Flamino J; Galeazzi A; Feldman S; Macy MW; Cross B; Zhou Z; Serafino M; Bovet A; Makse HA; Szymanski BK
Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 7(6):904-916. PubMed ID: 36914806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of Facebook and Instagram on the 2020 election: A deactivation experiment.
Allcott H; Gentzkow M; Mason W; Wilkins A; Barberá P; Brown T; Cisneros JC; Crespo-Tenorio A; Dimmery D; Freelon D; González-Bailón S; Guess AM; Kim YM; Lazer D; Malhotra N; Moehler D; Nair-Desai S; Nait El Barj H; Nyhan B; Paixao de Queiroz AC; Pan J; Settle J; Thorson E; Tromble R; Velasco Rivera C; Wittenbrink B; Wojcieszak M; Zahedian S; Franco A; Kiewiet de Jonge C; Stroud NJ; Tucker JA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(21):e2321584121. PubMed ID: 38739793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ratioing the President: An exploration of public engagement with Obama and Trump on Twitter.
Minot JR; Arnold MV; Alshaabi T; Danforth CM; Dodds PS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0248880. PubMed ID: 33852612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility.
Lyons BA; Montgomery JM; Guess AM; Nyhan B; Reifler J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34074757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality.
Pennycook G; Rand DG
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Feb; 116(7):2521-2526. PubMed ID: 30692252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supersharers of fake news on Twitter.
Baribi-Bartov S; Swire-Thompson B; Grinberg N
Science; 2024 May; 384(6699):979-982. PubMed ID: 38815033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017.
Bail CA; Guay B; Maloney E; Combs A; Hillygus DS; Merhout F; Freelon D; Volfovsky A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(1):243-250. PubMed ID: 31767743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.
Guess A; Nagler J; Tucker J
Sci Adv; 2019 Jan; 5(1):eaau4586. PubMed ID: 30662946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fallibility Salience Increases Intellectual Humility: Implications for People's Willingness to Investigate Political Misinformation.
Koetke J; Schumann K; Porter T; Smilo-Morgan I
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 May; 49(5):806-820. PubMed ID: 35272524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nursing Organizations' Health Policy Content on Facebook and Twitter Preceding the 2016 United States Presidential Election.
Waddell A
J Adv Nurs; 2019 Jan; 75(1):119-128. PubMed ID: 30109719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about sources of "fake news".
Michael RB; Breaux BO
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Feb; 6(1):6. PubMed ID: 33580444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.
Ahmed W; Vidal-Alaball J; Downing J; López Seguí F
J Med Internet Res; 2020 May; 22(5):e19458. PubMed ID: 32352383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combating Information Attacks in the Age of the Internet: New Challenges for Cognitive Engineering.
Endsley MR
Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1081-1094. PubMed ID: 30376429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.
Clayton K; Davis NT; Nyhan B; Porter E; Ryan TJ; Wood TJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34078668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
